Xiang Diao

Xiang Diao

Xiang Diao
Badge #27207, Asian Male
Police Officer at 25th Precinct since September 2025
Also served at US Open Tennis Detail, Field Training Unit
Service started January 2019, made $179,000 last year, Tax #967042

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2022-27657
Closed: 3/6/2023

View Details

Complaints

5 Complaints
13 Allegations
4 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
3 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
2 Exonerated
1 Unable to Determine
3 Unfounded
3 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202405649, May 2024
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Dominican Female, 55-59
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Dominican Female, 55-59
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #202310326, October 2023
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failed to Obtain Language Interpretation
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #202306310, July 2023
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #202305262, June 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Complainant: Female, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Allegation: Untruthful Statement: False official statement
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details

Complaint #202105282, September 2021
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #202405649, May 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Dominican Female, 55-59 Unfounded
Discourtesy: Word Dominican Female, 55-59 Unfounded
additional details
Complaint #202310326, October 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Hispanic Female, 25-29 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Failed to Obtain Language Interpretation Hispanic Female, 25-29 Unfounded
additional details
Complaint #202306310, July 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 30-34 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #202305262, June 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Hispanic Female, 30-34 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Female, 30-34 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Untruthful Statement: False official statement Unable to Determine
Force: Physical force Hispanic Female, 30-34 Within NYPD Guidelines
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details
Complaint #202105282, September 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Black Male, 35-39 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Black Male, 35-39 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Force: Physical force Black Male, 35-39 Exonerated
Force: Physical force Black Male, 35-39 Exonerated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Discipline

Case: 2022-27657
Closed: 3/6/2023
Case Details:
  1. Wrongfully frisked an individual known to the Department.
  2. Wrongfully searched an individual known to the Department.
Penalty: A - Command Discipline
Recommendation: Command Discipline - A