Christophe Callow

Badge #1310, White Male
Former Detective Grade 2 at Firearms Suppression Section
Also served at Manhattan South Narcotics District, Narcotics Borough Manhattan South
Service started August 1993, ended August 2020, Tax #903542

Complaints

4 Complaints
6 Allegations
0 Substantiated
2 Unfounded
4 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #200918348, November 2009
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 26
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 26
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #200000925, February 2000
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Complainant: Black Male, 43
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment
Complainant: Black Male, 43
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #9902287, October 1998
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #9702864, August 1997
Allegation: Discourtesy: Gay/Lesbian Slur
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #200918348, November 2009
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 26 Unsubstantiated
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 26 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #200000925, February 2000
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Black Male, 43 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment Black Male, 43 Unfounded
additional details
Complaint #9902287, October 1998
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #9702864, August 1997
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Gay/Lesbian Slur Unsubstantiated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.