Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
George J. Bravo
Badge #24537,
Hispanic Male
Police Officer at 32nd Precinct Detective Squad since March 2026
Also served at
32nd Precinct
Service
started November 2020,
made $86,500 last year,
Tax #969542
Complaints
3
Complaints
4
Allegations
1
Substantiated
1
Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
2
Closed - Pending Litigation
1
Within NYPD Guidelines
Complaint #202500282,
January 2025
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Female, 30-34 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
Complaint #202308335,
August 2023
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Nonlethal restraining device |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Hispanic Male, 30-34 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Closed - Pending Litigation |
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
| Complainant: | Hispanic Male, 30-34 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Closed - Pending Litigation |
Complaint #202301981,
March 2023
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Male, 35-39 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| NYPD Conclusion: | No Disciplinary Action-DUP |
| Penalty: | No penalty |
| Complaint #202500282, January 2025 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment | Female, 30-34 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202308335, August 2023 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Nonlethal restraining device | Hispanic Male, 30-34 | Closed - Pending Litigation |
| Force: Physical force | Hispanic Male, 30-34 | Closed - Pending Litigation |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202301981, March 2023 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera | Male, 35-39 | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP | ||
| Penalty: No penalty | ||
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusions.