Ali Hassan

Badge #1324, Asian Male
Police Officer at 105th Precinct since March 2020
Also served at 70th Precinct
Service started January 2016, made $154,000 last year, Tax #960642

Substantiated Allegations:
Force: Nightstick as club (incl asp & baton) (2)
Untruthful Statement: Misleading official statement

Complaints

4 Complaints
9 Allegations
3 Substantiated
3 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
1 Complainant Unavailable
1 Complainant Uncooperative
2 SRAD Closure
2 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #202604284, April 2026
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Black Male, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: SRAD Closure
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Female
CCRB Conclusion: SRAD Closure
additional details

Complaint #202503881, April 2025
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 15-17
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #202306847, May 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
additional details

Complaint #202004300, May 2020
Allegation: Force: Nightstick as club (incl asp & baton)
Complainant: Black Male, 37
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Force: Nightstick as club (incl asp & baton)
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 37
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Untruthful Statement: Misleading official statement
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
Complaint Report
NYPD Departure Letter
additional details

Complaint #202604284, April 2026
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Black Male, 45-49 SRAD Closure
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Female SRAD Closure
additional details
Complaint #202503881, April 2025
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 15-17 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #202306847, May 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Black Male, 30-34 Complainant Unavailable
additional details
Complaint #202004300, May 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Nightstick as club (incl asp & baton) Black Male, 37 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Force: Nightstick as club (incl asp & baton) Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 37 Unsubstantiated
Discourtesy: Word Unsubstantiated
Untruthful Statement: Misleading official statement Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
Complaint Report
NYPD Departure Letter
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'SRAD Closure': Strategic Resource Allocation Determination - due to citywide budget cuts, CCRB is no longer able to fully investigate certain cases within its jurisdiction and suspended investigating some types of complaints.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusions.


Lawsuits

Disu, Sami vs City of Ny
Case # 808091/2023E, Supreme Court - Bronx, May 24, 2023
Complaint
Description: On June 4, 2020, Plaintiff, a young black man, was video-recording a protest event when Defendant Officers, including Hassan and various John and Jane Does, aggressively approached Plaintiff with outstretched arms holding weapons. Defendants violently struck Plaintiff with a baton, asp, nightstick, or other kinetic/impact weapon numerous times about Plaintiff’s entire body, despite Plaintiff posing no immediate threat. Defendants, including Hassan, then engaged in a conspiracy to personally confer with each other, regarding non-existent evidence and observations, as well as the manner and means by which said fabrications would be forwarded to the District Attorney’s Office.

Other Documents