Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
Further details on conclusions.
Named in 2 known lawsuits, $10,000 total settlements.
Germain, Jeremy vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 503836/2014,
Supreme Court - Kings, August 25, 2014
Complaint
Description: On January 31, 2013, at approximately 1:40 p.m., plaintiff Jeremy Germain was falsely and unlawfully arrested by Police Officer Tanya O. Barry while attending the Arts & Media Preparatory Academy in Brooklyn, New York. The arrest was made despite clear exculpatory evidence that Germain was not involved in the alleged incidents. He was charged with robbery, assault, and other crimes based on false statements. The charges were eventually dismissed by a grand jury, but some charges remained pending. Germain suffered emotional distress and loss of liberty due to the false arrest and imprisonment.
Nisbit, Kendell vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 12CV06092,
U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, December 26, 2012, ended August 13, 2013
$10,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On December 11, 2009 plaintiff was lawfully present at 2921 Tilden Ave, Brooklyn, NY when he was stopped and arrested by defendants. Defendants also made false statements to cover up their abuse of authority. On June 15, 2010 , plaintiff was near 250 East 29th street Brooklyn, New York when he was unlawfully stopped and detained again by defendants, Eric Cox and Ferando Guerrero. The defendants had no probable cause.