Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusions.
Named in 2 known lawsuits.
Salim, Said vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 153856/2017,
Supreme Court - New York, April 28, 2017, ended June 29, 2018
Zero Disposition
Complaint
Description: On or about July 12, 2009 Plaintiff, an NYPD detective, participated in an undercover operation. During its course two arrests were made and Plaintiff signed a complaint charging them with possession of narcotics. Plaintiff testified at both the grand jury and pre-trial hearings. The cases were ultimately dismissed. On or about April 30, 2014, approximately 4 years after Plaintiff's testimony, Plaintiff was arrested by Lt Adam Ramos, Sgt. Wilbert Crawley, Det. Michael Corbett, Lt. Louron Hall, and POs John/Jane Does 1-10. Plaintiff was charged with perjury and was required to make approximately 12 court appearances before all charges were dismissed due to lack of evidence. POs suppressed evidence in order to ob...
Salim, Said vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 15CV08521,
U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, November 17, 2015, ended December 22, 2016
Zero Disposition
Complaint
Description: Plaintiff is a detective who was arrested for official misconduct, making a false written statement, and offering a false instrument after his testimony against someone he arrested as an undercover. He files this lawsuit saying he was falsely arrested.