Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'SRAD Closure': Strategic Resource Allocation Determination - due to citywide budget cuts, CCRB is no longer able to fully investigate certain cases within its jurisdiction and suspended investigating some types of complaints.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusions.
Named in 3 known lawsuits.
Walter, Amy Melinda R. vs City of Ny, Eet al.
Case # 163037/2025,
Supreme Court - New York, October 14, 2025
Jones, Shafiyq vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 22CV03924,
U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, July 26, 2022, ended August 1, 2023
Zero Disposition
Complaint
Description: On October 13, 2017, Plaintiff received a phone call from a family friend that his nephew was shot and killed, and Plaintiff went to the hospital where his nephew was held. While Jones and other family members waited around the morgue, Police Officers Holmes and Lin arrived and attempted to bar Plaintiff from the area, only allowing immediate family. Plaintiff attempted to go and receive doctor's permission, but Holmes pushed him. Plaintiff put up his hands and officer Lin and Holmes slammed him against a wall and punched him about the face and body, to which Plaintiff lost consciousness. The officers arrested Plaintiff, and processed him for 1 1/5 hours at the 48th precinct. Plaintiff injuries were so severe h...
Komatsu, Towaki vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 20CV10942,
U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, April 20, 2021, ended June 17, 2022
Zero Disposition
Complaint