David A. Caro

David A. Caro

David A. Caro
Badge #1328, Hispanic Male, 42
Sergeant at Midtown South Precinct since March 2022
Also served at 1st Precinct
Service started January 2007, made $153,000 last year, Tax #943052

Substantiated Allegations:
Force: Physical force

Lawsuit Settlements:
$30,000   Simmons, William vs City of New York, et al., 2014 NYCSC NYCSC 159740/2014
View Details

Complaints

4 Complaints
9 Allegations
1 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Charges)
1 Complainant Unavailable
1 Complaint Withdrawn
4 SRAD Closure
2 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #202602939, March 2026
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
additional details

Complaint #202412089, December 2024
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Complainant: Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: SRAD Closure
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Complainant: Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: SRAD Closure
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: SRAD Closure
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Complainant: Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: SRAD Closure
additional details

Complaint #201410329, October 2014
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched
CCRB Conclusion: Complaint Withdrawn
additional details

Complaint #201108291, June 2011
Allegation: Force: Nightstick as club (incl asp & baton)
Complainant: Asian Male, 41
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Asian Male, 41
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Complainant: Asian Male, 41
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Penalty: Command Discipline - B
additional details

Complaint #202602939, March 2026
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 30-34 Complainant Unavailable
additional details
Complaint #202412089, December 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Male, 35-39 SRAD Closure
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name Male, 35-39 SRAD Closure
Discourtesy: Word Male, 35-39 SRAD Closure
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Male, 35-39 SRAD Closure
additional details
Complaint #201410329, October 2014
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched Complaint Withdrawn
additional details
Complaint #201108291, June 2011
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Nightstick as club (incl asp & baton) Asian Male, 41 Unsubstantiated
Force: Physical force Asian Male, 41 Substantiated (Charges)
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Asian Male, 41 Unsubstantiated
Penalty: Command Discipline - B
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'SRAD Closure': Strategic Resource Allocation Determination - due to citywide budget cuts, CCRB is no longer able to fully investigate certain cases within its jurisdiction and suspended investigating some types of complaints.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusions.


Lawsuits

Simmons, William vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 159740/2014, Supreme Court - New York, November 6, 2014, ended April 24, 2017
$30,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On September 29, 2013, Plaintiff was working as a security guard and patrolling his assigned vicinity when Defendant NYPD officer Caro approached Plaintiff. The Defendant demanded identification and told Plaintiff to cease doing his job and leave the area. Defendant attacked Plaintiff, causing him to suffer physical injuries that required medical attention. Defendant arrested Plaintiff and transported him to the precinct. While detained at the precinct, Defendant and several other unidentified officers attacked Plaintiff and caused him to suffer further injury. Plaintiff was charged with several crimes, all of which were eventually dismissed.