Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusion definitions.
Case: 2022-27109
Closed: 1/20/2023
Case Details:
-
Wrongful threat of force.
-
Wrongfully discourteous to an individual known to the Department.
-
Wrongfully used physical force.
Recommendation: Charges and Specifications
Case: 2022-25180
Closed: 6/23/2022
Case Details:
-
Wrongfully discourteous to an individual known to the Department.
Penalty: A - Command Discipline, vacation days (2 days)
Recommendation: Command Discipline - A
Case: 2022-25007
Closed: 6/13/2022
Case Details:
-
Pleaded Guilty:
Wrongfully used physical force.
-
Pleaded Guilty:
Wrongfully discourteous to an individual known to the Department.
-
Pleaded Guilty:
Wrongful threat of force.
-
Pleaded Guilty:
Failed to activate their body worn camera.
-
Pleaded Guilty:
Wrongful threat of arrest.
Penalty: Training, vacation days (26 days)
Case: 2022-25181
Closed: 5/25/2022
Case Details:
-
Failed to make required entries in Department logs.
Penalty: Training
Recommendation: Training
Campbell, Dionne vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 527624/2022,
Supreme Court - Kings, September 21, 2022
