Miguel Vergara

Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Frisk and/or search
CCRB Conclusion:	Substantiated (No Recommendations)
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated

additional details

Complaint #200616392, December 2006
Allegation		CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched		Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #200411603, November 2004
Allegation	Complainant	CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word	Hispanic Female, 39	Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #200409349, September 2004
Allegation	Complainant	CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force	Male	Complaint Withdrawn
additional details
Complaint #9702312, June 1997
Allegation		CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Person Searched		Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #9401340, April 1994
Allegation		CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Frisk and/or search		Substantiated (No Recommendations)
Discourtesy: Word		Unsubstantiated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.

Lawsuits

Jones, Frank vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 302012/2009, Supreme Court - Bronx, April 7, 2009, ended September 21, 2016
Zero Disposition