Junior Sesay

Junior Sesay

Junior Sesay
Badge #7057, Black Male
Detective Specialist at 70th Precinct since January 2025
Also served at Quartermaster Section
Service started July 2010, made $158,000 last year, Tax #949652
junior.sesay@nypd.org

Substantiated Allegations:
Force: Physical force
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Abuse of Authority: Property damaged
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Untruthful Statement: False official statement
Untruthful Statement: Impeding an investigation

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2021-24391
Closed: 5/1/2024
Case: 2011-4441
Closed: 5/30/2012
Document

View Details

Articles

2020 NYC Protests, CCRB, 1/24/2023

Complaints

4 Complaints
10 Allegations
6 Substantiated
4 Substantiated (Charges)
1 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
2 Complainant Uncooperative
1 Unfounded
1 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202311239, November 2023
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Female, 15-17
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Female, 15-17
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
NYPD Conclusion: Previously Adjudicated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Complainant: Black Female, 15-17
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Complainant: Female, 15-17
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
NYPD Conclusion: Formalized Training
Penalty: Dismissal Probation 365 days / Suspension: 25 days / Vacation: 5 days
additional details

Complaint #202003854, May 2020
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Property damaged
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Untruthful Statement: False official statement
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Untruthful Statement: Impeding an investigation
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Not guilty
CCRB Recommended Penalty: Terminated
APU Case Status: Closed: Not guilty after trial-PC Approved, March 4, 2024
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Closing Report
NYPD Trial Decision
additional details

Complaint #201400200, January 2014
Allegation: Force: Hit against inanimate object
Complainant: Male, 23
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #201304862, May 2013
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 28
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #202311239, November 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Female, 15-17 Within NYPD Guidelines
Force: Physical force Black Female, 15-17 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
NYPD Conclusion: Previously Adjudicated
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Black Female, 15-17 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Female, 15-17 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
NYPD Conclusion: Formalized Training
Penalty: Dismissal Probation 365 days / Suspension: 25 days / Vacation: 5 days
additional details
Complaint #202003854, May 2020
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Property damaged Substantiated (Charges)
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Substantiated (Charges)
Untruthful Statement: False official statement Substantiated (Charges)
Untruthful Statement: Impeding an investigation Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Not guilty
CCRB Recommended Penalty: Terminated
APU Case Status: Closed: Not guilty after trial-PC Approved, March 4, 2024
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Closing Report
NYPD Trial Decision
additional details
Complaint #201400200, January 2014
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Hit against inanimate object Male, 23 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #201304862, May 2013
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 28 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Discipline

Case: 2021-24391
Closed: 5/1/2024
Case Details:
  1. Failed to activate their body worn camera.
Recommendation: Other

Case: 2011-4441
Document
Opened: 8/12/2011
Closed: 5/30/2012
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: Wrongfully engaged in a physical altercation with an individual known to the Department
  2. Guilty: Failed to remain at scene of said incident
  3. Guilty: Failed to notify Commanding Officer at police academy of said incident
Penalty: Forfeiture of twenty (20) vacation days


Lawsuits

Romulus, Eric vs City of New York et al.
Case # 545208/2025, Supreme Court - New York, February 25, 2026

Other Documents

NYPD Trial Decision 2/27/2024
Bronx DA Notified Officer List
DA Disclosure Letter
Employment History Summary