Jaylene Rodriguez

Jaylene Rodriguez

Jaylene Rodriguez
Badge #12800, Hispanic Female
Police Officer at 46th Precinct Detective Squad since October 2025
Also served at 41st Precinct, 50th Precinct
Service started October 2019, made $118,000 last year, Tax #968752

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera

Lawsuit Settlements:
$50,000   Martinez, Jairo vs City of Ny, et al., 2021 BCSC BCSC 800055/2021E
$50,000   Betances, Enny, et al. vs City of New York, et al., 2020 BCSC BCSC 033089/2020E
View Details

Complaints

2 Complaints
6 Allegations
1 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Unfounded
4 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202406607, June 2024
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #202306590, July 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Hispanic, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Complainant: Age 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Hispanic, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Hispanic, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Hispanic, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details

Complaint #202406607, June 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Black Male, 35-39 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #202306590, July 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Hispanic, 25-29 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Age 25-29 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Hispanic, 25-29 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Hispanic, 25-29 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Hispanic, 25-29 Within NYPD Guidelines
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Lawsuits

Named in 5 known lawsuits, $100,000 total settlements.

Callaham, James vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 818585/2024E, Supreme Court - Bronx, March 11, 2025

Johnson, Glenn vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 21CV10535, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, January 14, 2022, ended July 24, 2023
Zero Disposition
Complaint

Martinez, Jairo vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 800055/2021E, Supreme Court - Bronx, January 7, 2021, ended April 6, 2022
$50,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On June 4, 2020, defendant POs, including Rodriguez, approached and arrested plaintiff when he was walking in the vicinity of 1035 Longwood Avenue. Plaintiff had multiple assaults and batteries, committed to his person, by defendants. Plaintiff was rear handcuffed by defendants, including Rodriguez, and placed in a NYPD vehicle to be transported to 41th NYPD Precinct. Upon arrival or while plaintiff remained remained at the 41th NYPD Precinct, he was illegally searched, questioned, photographed and fingerprinted by, or at the direction of Defendants. Defendants made false statements and plaintiff was charged with charges. Plaintiff was compelled to return to court, multiple times. On September 4, 2020, all cha...

Betances, Enny, et al. vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 033089/2020E, Supreme Court - Bronx, November 4, 2020, ended October 18, 2021
$50,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On May 7, 2020, Defendant POs unlawfully stopped, searched, and use excessive force to arrest Plaintiffs without just cause or provocation. Defendant POs then strip searched, incarcerated, and maliciously prosecuted Plaintiffs. As a result of Defendants POs' actions, Plaintiffs suffered severe mental anguish, emotional distress, infliction of physical illness, humiliation, indignities, embarrassment, degradation, injury to reputation and standing in the community both professionally and personally, restrictions on all forms of personal freedom, deprivation of liberty, fear and scorn. The claims against Plaintiffs terminated favorably by dismissal.

D., J. Infant By M/n/g Day, Aisha, et al. vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 506539/2020, Supreme Court - Kings, August 6, 2020
Complaint
Description: On or about March 16, 2017 at approximately 4:00 a.m. at 725 Greene Avenue POs Rodriguez, Galloway, Smith, Jerome J. Boone, and John Does 1-10 entered the residence without legal justification and pointed guns at Plaintiff's head and minor children while the minor children slept. POs punched and kicked Plaintiff and forced her to strip in front of a male officer. Plaintiff and fellow plaintiff were handcuffed for approximately 8 hours while POs ransacked 725 Greene Avenue and Plaintiff's second home at 553 East 108th Street. POs seized jewelry, $15,000 in cash, and destroyed property. No charges were brought against plaintiffs but Plaintiff was threated that if she did not sign a document she would be arrested,...