Jimmy M. Romero

Jimmy M. Romero

Jimmy M. Romero
Badge #5064, Hispanic Male, 34
Sergeant at Strategic Response Group 3 Brooklyn since August 2026
Service started July 2016, made $165,000 last year, Tax #962062

Substantiated Allegations:
Force: Restricted Breathing
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2019-21543
Closed: 3/16/2020
Case: 2017-17654
Closed: 11/3/2017

View Details

Complaints

6 Complaints
10 Allegations
3 Substantiated
2 Substantiated (Charges)
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
1 Closed - Pending Litigation
1 Complainant Unavailable
1 Complaint Withdrawn
1 Exonerated
2 Unfounded
1 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #202509956, September 2025
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
Complainant: Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Complaint Withdrawn
additional details

Complaint #202106259, October 2021
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details

Complaint #202007501, November 2020
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Complainant: Black Female, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #201900826, January 2019
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search of recording device
Complainant: Black Female, 39
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Penalty: Command Discipline - B
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #201809503, November 2018
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 37
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #201808743, October 2018
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Guilty
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 27
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Force: Restricted Breathing
Complainant: Black Male, 27
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Not guilty
Allegation: Force: Chokehold
Complainant: Black Male, 27
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
APU Case Status: Closed: Guilty after trial-PC Approved, September 21, 2023
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 5 days
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Closing Report
NYPD Trial Decision
additional details

Complaint #202509956, September 2025
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Male, 18-20 Complaint Withdrawn
additional details
Complaint #202106259, October 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 18-20 Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details
Complaint #202007501, November 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Black Female, 45-49 Unfounded
additional details
Complaint #201900826, January 2019
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Abuse of Authority: Search of recording device Black Female, 39 Unfounded
Penalty: Command Discipline - B
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #201809503, November 2018
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 37 Complainant Unavailable
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #201808743, October 2018
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Guilty
Force: Physical force Black Male, 27 Exonerated
Force: Restricted Breathing Black Male, 27 Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Not guilty
Force: Chokehold Black Male, 27 Unsubstantiated
APU Case Status: Closed: Guilty after trial-PC Approved, September 21, 2023
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 5 days
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Closing Report
NYPD Trial Decision
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusions.


Discipline

Case: 2019-21543
Closed: 3/16/2020
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: Failed to obtain medical treatment.
Penalty: Vacation days (5 days)

Case: 2017-17654
Closed: 11/3/2017
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: Failed to appear for his scheduled tour of duty.
  2. Guilty: Failed to report to his district surgon as directed.
  3. Guilty: Left the confines of the city and residence counties without the approval of the chief of personnel.
  4. Guilty: Made misleading statements to a Supervisor concerning the reason he failed to report to his district surgeon.
Penalty: Vacation days (25 days)


Lawsuits

Named in 2 known lawsuits.

Castillo, Fernando Luna vs Police Officer Romero, Jimmy, et al.
Case # 525726/2023, Supreme Court - Kings, December 18, 2023
Complaint
Description: On June 25, 2022, while plaintiff was a pedestrian at a street, police officers Jimmy Romero (Sheild No. 5558), Francesco Scalici (Sheild No. 7889), Sajiad Asar (Sheild No. 16889), Hilton Jeanpierre (Sheild No. 1205), and other police officers engaged in a high speed chase in pursuit of a motor vehicle. The officers’ pursuit caused, permitted, and allowed the chased vehicle to strike and collide into several vehicles and pedestrians, including the plaintiff.

Butts, Rasheen vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 524741/2020, Supreme Court - Kings, December 11, 2020
Complaint
Description: On July 4, 2019, Plaintiff was involved in a traffic accident in Brooklyn. Defendant Officers Jimmy Romero and Hilton Jeanpierre, as well as up to ten unnamed Defendant Officers, arrived at the scene. Because of Plaintiff's race, religion, national origin, ethnicity or other improper characteristics, the Defendant Officers began to illegally question and search Plaintiff, without cause. Defendant Officers forced Plaintiff's arm behind his back and handcuffed him, refusing to loosen the handcuffs when Plaintiff complained they were too tight, which caused swelling, bruising and loss of feeling in Plaintiff's wrists. Defendant Officers then transported Plaintiff to the 81st Precinct and continued to search Plain...

Other Documents