Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Abuse of Authority: Other
Abuse of Authority: Stop
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Abuse of Authority: Other
Abuse of Authority: Stop
Dina M. Valentin
Lieutenant at 23rd Precinct since August 2026
Also served at
Police Service Area 8,
Patrol Borough Bronx,
Strategic Response Group 1 Manhattan,
Police Service Area 9,
Police Service Area 7
Service
started January 2005,
made $181,000 last year,
Tax #936062
Hispanic Female
Complaints
3
Complaints
10
Allegations
3
Substantiated
1
Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
2
Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1
Alleged Victim Unavailable
2
Complaint Withdrawn
1
Unable to Determine
3
Within NYPD Guidelines
Complaint #202411086,
August 2024
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Male, 40-44 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 40-44 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Property damaged |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 40-44 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
Complaint #202303584,
April 2023
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Age 18-20 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Stop |
| Complainant: | Age 18-20 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Other |
| Complainant: | Age 18-20 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Command Discipline B) |
| Allegation: | Untruthful Statement: False official statement |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
| NYPD Conclusion: | APU Command Discipline A |
| APU Plea Penalty: | Forfeit vacation 3 days |
| APU Case Status: | Closed: Resolved by plea, September 18, 2025 |
| Penalty: | Forfeit vacation 3 days / Command Discipline A |
| Documents: | APU Quarterly Report summary |
| NYPD Plea Agreement |
Complaint #200716981,
November 2007
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Male |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Complaint Withdrawn |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Stop |
| Complainant: | Black Female, 22 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Complaint Withdrawn |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Stop |
| Complainant: | Male |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Alleged Victim Unavailable |
| Complaint #202411086, August 2024 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises | Male, 40-44 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital | Black Male, 40-44 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Abuse of Authority: Property damaged | Black Male, 40-44 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202303584, April 2023 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card | Age 18-20 | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| Abuse of Authority: Stop | Age 18-20 | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| Abuse of Authority: Other | Age 18-20 | Substantiated (Command Discipline B) |
| Untruthful Statement: False official statement | Unable to Determine | |
| NYPD Conclusion: APU Command Discipline A | ||
| APU Plea Penalty: Forfeit vacation 3 days | ||
| APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, September 18, 2025 | ||
| Penalty: Forfeit vacation 3 days / Command Discipline A | ||
| Documents: | APU Quarterly Report summary | |
| NYPD Plea Agreement | ||
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #200716981, November 2007 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) | Male | Complaint Withdrawn |
| Abuse of Authority: Stop | Black Female, 22 | Complaint Withdrawn |
| Abuse of Authority: Stop | Male | Alleged Victim Unavailable |
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusions.
Discipline
Closed: 10/2/2024
Case Details:
- Breached eeo confidentiality requirements.
Penalty: C - Command Discipline, vacation days (15 days)
Recommendation: Other
Lawsuits
Ramos, Jorge vs City of New York, et al.Case # 26CV03142, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, May 22, 2026