Ana M. Gutierrez
Badge #30002,
Hispanic Female
Police Officer at Internal Affairs Bureau since November 2025
Service
started January 2018,
made $171,000 last year,
Tax #965162
Complaints
3
Complaints
3
Allegations
0
Substantiated
1
Complaint Withdrawn
1
Exonerated
1
Within NYPD Guidelines
Complaint #202411704,
November 2024
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Male, 21-24 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Complaint Withdrawn |
Complaint #202204476,
July 2022
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male, 45-49 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
Complaint #201808001,
September 2018
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Stop |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male, 33 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Exonerated |
| Complaint #202411704, November 2024 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Physical force | Male, 21-24 | Complaint Withdrawn |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202204476, July 2022 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital | Black Male, 45-49 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #201808001, September 2018 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Stop | Black Male, 33 | Exonerated |
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusions.
Lawsuits
Jobe-Simon, Mawule vs City of Ny, et al.Case # 159313/2023, Supreme Court - New York, October 5, 2023
Complaint
Description: On July 2, 2022, Plaintiff was lawfully present in the hallway of his apartment building when Defendant Police Officers approached him without justification. They began to question him, when one of the Defendants suddenly grabbed Plaintiff, pushed him backwards, and slammed the back of his head into the door frame, causing Plaintiff to begin bleeding. Plaintiff was then placed in overly-tight handcuffs and physically dragged out of the building and into an ambulance. To drag Plaintiff, Defendants grabbed him by his dreadlocks (which are religiously significant to Plaintiff), tearing some of them out in the process. Defendants provided false information to take Plaintiff to a hospital, where he received medical ...