Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Unlawful Arrest
Abuse of Authority: Unlawful Arrest
Jexter N. Bonus
Badge #879,
Asian Male
Sergeant at Vice Enforcement Squad Zone 2 since June 2026
Service
started January 2010,
made $177,000 last year,
Tax #948462
Complaints
2
Complaints
3
Allegations
1
Substantiated
1
Substantiated (Charges)
1
Complainant Unavailable
1
Unable to Determine
Complaint #202306215,
July 2023
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (Race) |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Male, 21-24 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Unlawful Arrest |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 21-24 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Charges) |
| NYPD Conclusion: | APU Command Discipline B |
| APU Plea Penalty: | Forfeit vacation 10 days |
| APU Case Status: | Closed: Resolved by plea, February 5, 2026 |
| Penalty: | Forfeit vacation 10 days / Command Discipline B |
Complaint #202107550,
December 2021
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male, 25-29 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Complainant Unavailable |
| Complaint #202306215, July 2023 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (Race) | Male, 21-24 | Unable to Determine |
| Abuse of Authority: Unlawful Arrest | Black Male, 21-24 | Substantiated (Charges) |
| NYPD Conclusion: APU Command Discipline B | ||
| APU Plea Penalty: Forfeit vacation 10 days | ||
| APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, February 5, 2026 | ||
| Penalty: Forfeit vacation 10 days / Command Discipline B | ||
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202107550, December 2021 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Physical force | Black Male, 25-29 | Complainant Unavailable |
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
Further details on conclusions.