Michael J. Boom

Michael J. Boom

Michael J. Boom
Badge #2792, Hispanic Male
Police Officer at 47th Precinct since September 2020
Service started July 2013, made $160,000 last year, Tax #954562

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Other
Abuse of Authority: Sex Miscon (Sexual/Romantic Proposition)
Untruthful Statement: False official statement

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2023-28714
Closed: 10/4/2023

View Details

Lawsuit Settlements:
$1,530   Geico General Insurance Company A/s/o Guy- Benloss, Lorna, et Al vs City of New York, et al., 2019 CCQ CCQ 001574/2019
View Details

Complaints

2 Complaints
6 Allegations
3 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
2 Substantiated (Charges)
3 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #202305245, May 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Sex Miscon (Sexual/Romantic Proposition)
Complainant: Black Female, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Guilty
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Other
Complainant: Black Female, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Dismissed
Allegation: Untruthful Statement: False official statement
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Guilty
APU Plea Penalty: Dismissal Probation 1 days
APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, April 2, 2026
Penalty: Dismissal Probation 1 days / Forfeit vacation 30 days
Documents: CCRB Annual Report
Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #201908633, September 2019
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Complainant: Female, 44
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Complainant: Female, 44
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Female, 44
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #202305245, May 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Sex Miscon (Sexual/Romantic Proposition) Black Female, 45-49 Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Guilty
Abuse of Authority: Other Black Female, 45-49 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Dismissed
Untruthful Statement: False official statement Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Guilty
APU Plea Penalty: Dismissal Probation 1 days
APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, April 2, 2026
Penalty: Dismissal Probation 1 days / Forfeit vacation 30 days
Documents: CCRB Annual Report
Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #201908633, September 2019
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Female, 44 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name Female, 44 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Female, 44 Unsubstantiated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusions.


Discipline

Case: 2023-28714
Closed: 10/4/2023
Case Details:
  1. Made computer inquiries unrelated to official Department business.
Penalty: B - Command Discipline, vacation days (10 days)
Recommendation: Command Discipline - B


Lawsuits

Named in 2 known lawsuits, $1,530 total settlements.

Evans, Rasheen vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 826331/2025E, Supreme Court - Bronx, December 22, 2025

Geico General Insurance Company A/s/o Guy- Benloss, Lorna, et Al vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 001574/2019, Civil Court - Queens, January 23, 2019, ended June 6, 2019
$1,530 Settlement

Other Documents