Conclusion Meanings:
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusions.
Named in 3 known lawsuits, $301,000 total settlements.
Sosa, Mike, et al. vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 300547/2013,
Supreme Court - Bronx, January 29, 2013, ended March 7, 2017
$300,000 Settlement
Nabors et al v. City of New York et al
Case # 154856/2017,
Supreme Court - New York
Summons/Complaint
Cousin v. City Of New York et al
Case # 15CV05272,
U.S. District Court - Southern District NY
$1,000 Settlement
First Amended Complaint
Description: Plaintiff and his employer were engaged in a verbal disagreement when Defendant Officers approached, searched Plaintiff, used excessive physical force when arresting him, and then confined him in a body bag to remove him from the location. Officers lied to medical personnel to have Plaintiff put in a psychiatric ward. It is unclear if any charges were filed against him.