Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'OMB PEG Directive Closure': Due to citywide budget cuts, CCRB is no longer able to fully investigate certain cases within its jurisdiction and suspended investigating some types of complaints.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusions.
Named in 2 known lawsuits.
James, Egobeda vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 719842/2024,
Supreme Court - Queens, January 21, 2025
Smith, Kevin vs Gosine, Rachel, et al.
Case # 700859/2014,
Supreme Court - Queens, March 4, 2014
Complaint
Description: On or about February 28, 2013, Defendant Rachel Gosine had Plaintiff arrested by Defendant Police Officer Pablo DeJesus without probable cause or a warrant. On or about March 1, 2013, Defendant DeJesus commenced with the criminal prosecution of Plaintiff and continued it until it failed on October 25, 2013. This caused Plaintiff embarassment, shock, and to incur legal fees.
On or about May 9, 2013, Defendant Gosine had Plaintiff arrested by Defendant Police Officer Andrew Fitzgerald without probable cause or a warrant, and criminal prosecution commenced at that time. The prosecution continued until it failed on October 25, 2013. This caused Plaintiff embarassment, shock, and to incur legal fees.
On or about...