Substantiated Allegations:
Force: Physical force
Abuse of Authority: Failed to Obtain Language Interpretation
Force: Physical force
Abuse of Authority: Failed to Obtain Language Interpretation
Atisha L. Samuel
Badge #14987,
Black Female
Police Officer at Midtown North Precinct since December 2017
Service
started October 2016,
made $159,000 last year,
Tax #962772
Complaints
3
Complaints
8
Allegations
2
Substantiated
1
Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1
Substantiated (Charges)
1
OMB PEG Directive Closure
1
Unable to Determine
4
Unfounded
Complaint #202310827,
November 2023
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Threat re: removal to hospital |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | White Male, 45-49 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | OMB PEG Directive Closure |
Complaint #202200826,
February 2022
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | White Female, 45-49 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| Allegation: | Force: Hit against inanimate object |
| Complainant: | White Female, 45-49 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
| Complainant: | White Female, 45-49 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number |
| Complainant: | White Female, 45-49 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name |
| Complainant: | White Female, 45-49 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
Complaint #202000071,
January 2020
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Hispanic Female, 10-14 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Charges) |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Failed to Obtain Language Interpretation |
| Complainant: | Hispanic Female, 10-14 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| NYPD Conclusion: | APU Not guilty |
| CCRB Recommended Penalty: | Forfeit vacation 13 days |
| APU Case Status: | Closed: Not guilty after trial-PC Approved, March 5, 2024 |
| Documents: | APU Quarterly Report summary |
| Complaint Closing Report | |
| NYPD Trial Decision |
| Complaint #202310827, November 2023 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Threat re: removal to hospital | White Male, 45-49 | OMB PEG Directive Closure |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202200826, February 2022 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Physical force | White Female, 45-49 | Unfounded |
| Force: Hit against inanimate object | White Female, 45-49 | Unable to Determine |
| Force: Physical force | White Female, 45-49 | Unfounded |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number | White Female, 45-49 | Unfounded |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name | White Female, 45-49 | Unfounded |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202000071, January 2020 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Physical force | Hispanic Female, 10-14 | Substantiated (Charges) |
| Abuse of Authority: Failed to Obtain Language Interpretation | Hispanic Female, 10-14 | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| NYPD Conclusion: APU Not guilty | ||
| CCRB Recommended Penalty: Forfeit vacation 13 days | ||
| APU Case Status: Closed: Not guilty after trial-PC Approved, March 5, 2024 | ||
| Documents: | APU Quarterly Report summary | |
| Complaint Closing Report | ||
| NYPD Trial Decision | ||
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'OMB PEG Directive Closure': Due to citywide budget cuts, CCRB is no longer able to fully investigate certain cases within its jurisdiction and suspended investigating some types of complaints.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
Further details on conclusions.
Discipline
Case: 2022-24579
Closed: 8/9/2022
Case Details:
- Failed to activate their body worn camera.
- Failed to prepare required reports.
Recommendation: Other