Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Kourtney J. Peralta
Badge #2412,
Hispanic Female
Detective Grade 3 at Bronx Robbery Squad since August 2024
Also served at
42nd Precinct
Service
started January 2020,
made $101,000 last year,
Tax #969282
Complaints
5
Complaints
16
Allegations
1
Substantiated
1
Substantiated (Formalized Training)
7
Unable to Determine
3
Unfounded
5
Within NYPD Guidelines
Complaint #202402752,
March 2024
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male, 25-29 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Question |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 25-29 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
Complaint #202405685,
December 2023
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Male, 25-29 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number |
| Complainant: | Male, 25-29 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name |
| Complainant: | Male, 25-29 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
Complaint #202311680,
December 2023
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Hispanic Male, 25-29 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card |
| Complainant: | Hispanic Male, 25-29 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
Complaint #202303426,
April 2023
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Stop |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male, 30-34 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Frisk |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 30-34 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 30-34 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 30-34 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 30-34 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 30-34 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Failure to Explain |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 30-34 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 30-34 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Formalized Training) |
| NYPD Conclusion: | No Disciplinary Action-DUP |
| Penalty: | No penalty |
Complaint #202207257,
October 2022
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male, 40-44 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Documents: | Complaint Closing Report |
| Complaint #202402752, March 2024 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Physical force | Black Male, 25-29 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Abuse of Authority: Question | Black Male, 25-29 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202405685, December 2023 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card | Male, 25-29 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number | Male, 25-29 | Unfounded |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name | Male, 25-29 | Unfounded |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202311680, December 2023 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop | Hispanic Male, 25-29 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card | Hispanic Male, 25-29 | Unfounded |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202303426, April 2023 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Stop | Black Male, 30-34 | Unable to Determine |
| Abuse of Authority: Frisk | Black Male, 30-34 | Unable to Determine |
| Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) | Black Male, 30-34 | Unable to Determine |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name | Black Male, 30-34 | Unable to Determine |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number | Black Male, 30-34 | Unable to Determine |
| Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card | Black Male, 30-34 | Unable to Determine |
| Abuse of Authority: Failure to Explain | Black Male, 30-34 | Unable to Determine |
| Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card | Black Male, 30-34 | Substantiated (Formalized Training) |
| NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP | ||
| Penalty: No penalty | ||
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202207257, October 2022 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Physical force | Black Male, 40-44 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Documents: | Complaint Closing Report | |
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusions.
Lawsuits
Named in 2 known lawsuits.Bernacet, Elvin vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 803476/2026E, Supreme Court - Bronx, April 14, 2026
Muhammad, Habiyb vs City of New Yokr, et al.
Case # 802315/2024E, Supreme Court - Bronx, February 8, 2024
Complaint
Description: ON July 5, 2023, NYPD Officers Singh, Peralta and others stopped, searched, pushed, assaulted, battered, violated and detained Plaintiff. The officers approached and arrested Plaintiff without an arrest warrant, probable cause or legal justification. Officers Singh, Peralta, and others then initiated a malicious prosecution against Plaintiff, causing him humiliation. As a result of the excessive force used to search and detain Plaintiff, he sustained injuries to his head, neck, back, body and limbs. Plaintiff remain incarcerated for over 24 hours and was required to appear in court over an extended period of time until all charges against him were terminated. Plaintiff also had to seek medical aid for his ex...