Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusions.
Sistrunk, Joseph vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 525149/2021,
Supreme Court - Kings, October 8, 2021, ended December 26, 2023
$16,500 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On June 15, 2020, the plaintiff, a black male, was inside of his apartment in Brooklyn, NY when his roommate assaulted a female in said apartment. Despite the plaintiff trying to stop the assault and the victim confirming to the defendant officers upon their arrival that the plaintiff was not the perpetrator, officer John Veloz and officers John/Jane Doe 1-10 nonetheless aggressively applied handcuffs in a tight fashion to the plaintiff and took him to an NYPD precinct where he was subject to further indignities. At no point did any of the defendant officers observe the plaintiff commit a crime, nor did they have reason to justify their stop, seizure, search and arrest of the plaintiff. Based on racially motiva...