Andre M. Brown

Badge #3760, Hispanic Male
Detective Grade 3 at Drug Enforcement Task Force since June 2026
Service started October 2018, made $172,000 last year, Tax #966482

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording
Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises
Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property (2)
Discourtesy: Word (2)
Offensive Language: Other
Offensive Language: Sexual orientation
Untruthful Statement: False official statement

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2022-26562
Closed: 3/28/2023
Case: 2022-26863
Closed: 11/3/2022
Case: 1 Allegation

View Details

Lawsuit Settlements:
$2,000   Ewell, Elijah vs City of Ny, et al., 2021 SDNY SDNY 21CV10290
$40,000   Acevedo, Justin vs City of Ny, et al., 2021 BCSC BCSC 807878/2021E
View Details

Complaints

6 Complaints
19 Allegations
11 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
2 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
4 Substantiated (Charges)
4 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
2 Unable to Determine
1 Unfounded
5 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #202300676, January 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property
Complainant: Age 55-59
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
NYPD Departure Letter
additional details

Complaint #202200687, February 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Guilty
APU Plea Penalty: Forfeit vacation 15 days
APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, January 6, 2025
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 10 days
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Closing Report
NYPD Plea Agreement
additional details

Complaint #202200557, January 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
Complainant: Black Female, 55-59
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
additional details

Complaint #202200648, January 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Complainant: Black Female, 80-99
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
additional details

Complaint #202102770, March 2021
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
Complainant: Black Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Offensive Language: Sexual orientation
Complainant: Black Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Guilty
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Guilty
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Guilty
Allegation: Offensive Language: Other
Complainant: Black Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Guilty
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property
Complainant: Black Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Guilty
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Black Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Black Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording
Complainant: Black Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Not guilty
Allegation: Untruthful Statement: False official statement
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Not guilty
APU Plea Penalty: Forfeit vacation 15 days
APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, January 6, 2025
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 10 days
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Closing Report
NYPD Plea Agreement
additional details

Complaint #202101208, February 2021
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Penalty: Formalized Training
additional details

Complaint #202300676, January 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property Age 55-59 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
NYPD Departure Letter
additional details
Complaint #202200687, February 2022
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Guilty
APU Plea Penalty: Forfeit vacation 15 days
APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, January 6, 2025
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 10 days
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Closing Report
NYPD Plea Agreement
additional details
Complaint #202200557, January 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Black Female, 55-59 Unable to Determine
additional details
Complaint #202200648, January 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Black Female, 80-99 Unable to Determine
additional details
Complaint #202102770, March 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Black Male, 18-20 Unsubstantiated
Offensive Language: Sexual orientation Black Male, 18-20 Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Guilty
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 18-20 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Guilty
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 18-20 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Guilty
Offensive Language: Other Black Male, 18-20 Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Guilty
Force: Physical force Black Male, 18-20 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property Black Male, 18-20 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Guilty
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Black Male, 18-20 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Black Male, 18-20 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording Black Male, 18-20 Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Not guilty
Untruthful Statement: False official statement Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Not guilty
APU Plea Penalty: Forfeit vacation 15 days
APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, January 6, 2025
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 10 days
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Closing Report
NYPD Plea Agreement
additional details
Complaint #202101208, February 2021
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Penalty: Formalized Training
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusions.


Discipline

Case: 2022-26562
Closed: 3/28/2023
Case Details:
  1. Failed to make required entries in Department logs.
  2. Violated patrol rules - failed to provide a business card
Penalty: Training
Recommendation: Training

Case: 2022-26863
Closed: 11/3/2022
Case Details:
  1. Failed to make required entries in Department logs.
Recommendation: Other

Case Details:
  1. Wrongfully threatened to damage property.
Recommendation: No disciplinary action


Lawsuits

Named in 3 known lawsuits, $42,000 total settlements.

Ewell, Elijah vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 21CV10290, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, December 9, 2021, ended May 11, 2022
$2,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On February 16, 2021, plaintiff Elijah Ewell was stopped, detained, and arrested at about 10:30 pm in the vicinity of Sound View Avenue and Watson Avenue in the Bronx by NYPD officers Daniel Ramos and Andrew Brown and NYPD Det. Sergt. Robert Vassallo. Plaintiff resided at the Sound View Housing Complex at Sound View Avenue, and booked a car service trip on the Excellent app. After being picked up by his driver, who was also Black, the car traveled one block up Watson avenue before being pulled over by Defendants Ramos, Brown, and Vassallo in an unmarked black car. Plaintiff overheard the officers speaking to the driver about vehicle license plate and tail defects and noting that plaintiff was not wearing his se...

Vizcaino, Billy vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 816116/2021E, Supreme Court - Bronx, November 30, 2021
Complaint
Description: On July 5, 2021, plaintiff was was in front of the premises known as 1155 Morrison Avenue, County of Bronx and the premises known as 1171 Morrison Avenue, County of Bronx. Plaintiff was subject to assault, battery, malicious prosecution, false arrest, false imprisonment, unwarranted unnecessary force and use of excessive force. There was wrongful touching, grabbing, handcuffing and seizing of the Plaintiff by defendant officers Andre Brown, Anthony Fiol and others (together the "defendants") without any reasonable cause. Plaintiff required medical attention as a result and has been unable to attend his usual occupation in the manner required. As a result of the defendants' negligence the plaintiff suffered seve...

Acevedo, Justin vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 807878/2021E, Supreme Court - Bronx, June 9, 2021, ended February 15, 2024
$40,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On March 14, 2021, at approximately 12:30 AM in the vicinity of Beach Avenue and Gleason Avenue, Plaintiff was walking home from a friend's home when he stopped to speak with some other friends who were out on the street. While Plaintiff was speaking with his friends, defendants Police Officers VELZEZ, BROWN and DOES approached one of Plaintiff's friends and arrested him. The Plaintiff attempted to video the actions of PO VELEZ, BROWN and DOES when he was tasered to his chest by the Defendants. The Defendants had no probable cause or reasonable suspicion that the plaintiff was engaged in an illegal activity. Despite the absence of any evidence of wrongdoing by the Plaintiff, the Defendants formally arrested the...