Douglas Soriano

Douglas Soriano

Douglas Soriano
Also served at Patrol Borough Bronx Specialized Units, 46th Precinct, Patrol Borough Bronx, 43rd Precinct, 50th Precinct, 52nd Precinct, 48th Precinct
Service started July 2010, made $194,000 last year, Tax #949682
Hispanic Male

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Discourtesy: Other
Discourtesy: Word (2)


Lawsuit Settlements:
$10,000   Kendall, Jeremiah vs City of New York, et al., 2020 BCSC BCSC 022664/2020E
$45,000   Diaz, Franklin vs City of New York, et al., 2019 BCSC BCSC 025492/2019E
$12,500   Sessoms, Kyle vs City of New York, et al., 2017 BCSC BCSC 025124/2017E
$18,000   Franks, Nkenijika, et al. vs City of New York, et al., 2017 SDNY SDNY 16CV09938
$35,000   Ospina, Daniel vs City of New York, et al., 2016 BCSC BCSC 025614/2016E
$5,001   Benjamin, Daysha vs City of New York, et al., 2015 SDNY SDNY 15CV08160
View Details

Complaints

8 Complaints
37 Allegations
5 Substantiated
5 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Exonerated
1 Unable to Determine
9 Unfounded
12 Unsubstantiated
9 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202408777, August 2024
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Female, 15-17
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #202303222, April 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #202208045, November 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details

Complaint #202201472, February 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Black Male, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #202104633, June 2021
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Sex Miscon (Sexual Harassment, Verbal)
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Discourtesy: Other
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Command Discipline A
APU Plea Penalty: Forfeit vacation 5 days
APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, February 5, 2024
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 5 days / Command Discipline A
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Closing Report
NYPD Plea Agreement
additional details

Complaint #201409875, September 2014
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Female, 16
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Female, 16
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 35
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 35
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Offensive Language: Other
Complainant: Black Female, 16
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment
Complainant: Black Female, 16
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 35
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #201305752, June 2013
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 17
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 17
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #201207555, May 2012
Allegation: Force: Chokehold
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 43
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 43
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 43
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Gesture
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 43
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #202408777, August 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Female, 15-17 Within NYPD Guidelines
Force: Physical force Black Male, 18-20 Unable to Determine
Force: Physical force Black Male, 18-20 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #202303222, April 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Black Male, 30-34 Within NYPD Guidelines
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 30-34 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Stop Male, 30-34 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Male, 30-34 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Male, 30-34 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #202208045, November 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording Hispanic Male, 30-34 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Hispanic Male, 30-34 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Hispanic Male, 30-34 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details
Complaint #202201472, February 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Stop Black Male, 45-49 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Stop Black Male, 30-34 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #202104633, June 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Hispanic Male, 25-29 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Hispanic Male, 25-29 Unsubstantiated
Discourtesy: Word Hispanic Male, 25-29 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Sex Miscon (Sexual Harassment, Verbal) Hispanic Male, 25-29 Unfounded
Discourtesy: Word Hispanic Male, 25-29 Unfounded
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 25-29 Unfounded
Discourtesy: Word Hispanic Male, 25-29 Unfounded
Discourtesy: Word Hispanic Male, 25-29 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Discourtesy: Word Hispanic Male, 25-29 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Discourtesy: Word Hispanic Male, 25-29 Unfounded
Discourtesy: Other Hispanic Male, 25-29 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: APU Command Discipline A
APU Plea Penalty: Forfeit vacation 5 days
APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, February 5, 2024
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 5 days / Command Discipline A
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Closing Report
NYPD Plea Agreement
additional details
Complaint #201409875, September 2014
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Black Female, 16 Unsubstantiated
Force: Physical force Black Female, 16 Unsubstantiated
Discourtesy: Word Hispanic Female, 35 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Hispanic Female, 35 Unsubstantiated
Offensive Language: Other Black Female, 16 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment Black Female, 16 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Hispanic Female, 35 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #201305752, June 2013
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 17 Exonerated
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 17 Unfounded
additional details
Complaint #201207555, May 2012
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Chokehold Hispanic Male, 43 Unsubstantiated
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 43 Unfounded
Discourtesy: Word Hispanic Male, 43 Unsubstantiated
Discourtesy: Gesture Hispanic Male, 43 Unsubstantiated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Discipline

Closed: 6/14/2024
Case Details:
  1. Wrongfully discourteous to an individual known to the Department.
Penalty: A - Command Discipline, vacation days (5 days)
Recommendation: Charges and Specifications

Case: 2024-30333
Closed: 5/12/2024
Case Details:
  1. Violated patrol rules.
  2. Wrongfully searched a vehicle.
Recommendation: Command Discipline - B

Case: 2017-17565
Closed: 12/5/2017
Case Details:
  1. Nolo contendre: Failure to notify radio dispatch.
  2. Nolo contendre: Failure to supervise.
  3. Nolo contendre: Failure to terminate a vehicle pursuit.
Penalty: Vacation days (10 days)


Lawsuits

Named in 8 known lawsuits, $125,501 total settlements.

Kendall, Jeremiah vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 022664/2020E, Supreme Court - Bronx, February 24, 2020, ended July 17, 2023
$10,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On October 4, 2019, NYPD officers Angel Perez, Douglas Soriano, and unnamed officers grabbed, handcuffed and searched Plaintiff. The officers found no contraband on Plaintiff then transported him to 41st Precinct, where Plaintiff was fingerprinted, photographed, and unlawfully detained. The officers falsely stated to the Bronx County DA Office that Plaintiff had committed the crime of Promoting Gambling despite knowing that they lacked a legal and factual basis to allege that Plaintiff committed any crime. On October 25, 2019, after 24 hours in police custody, Plaintiff was arraigned in Bronx County Criminal Court and was charged with crimes, which were all subsequently dismissed.

Diaz, Franklin vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 025492/2019E, Supreme Court - Bronx, July 16, 2019, ended July 13, 2022
$45,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On March 5, 2016, around 4:30 AM, Plaintiff Franklin Diaz was inside a livery cab near Olmstead Avenue and Bruckner Boulevard, Bronx, when Defendant Officers Douglas Soriano and [Unidentified First Name] Kennedy grabbed, touched, handcuffed, and seized Plaintiff with excessive force to make a false arrest for criminal possession of a weapon (second). Plaintiff was held for 3 days, until he posted bail of $2,500.00 and was released on March 8, 2016. On July 16, 2018, all charges were dismissed.

Sessoms, Kyle vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 025124/2017E, Supreme Court - Bronx, August 2, 2017, ended February 27, 2019
$12,500 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On April 10, 2016, plaintiff was falsely arrested and imprisoned in the 43rd Precinct. Without any legal or probable cause for said arrest, defendant officers (including officer Sarrano) wrongfully touched, grabbed, handcuffed and punched the plaintiff, using excessive force during the unlawful arrest, which resulted in both physical pain and mental suffering to the plaintiff.

Franks, Nkenijika, et al. vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 16CV09938, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, January 5, 2017, ended April 16, 2018
$18,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: Defendant Officer stopped Plaintiffs in their car with no probable, claiming he had found two guns in their car during a prior stop. Defendant Officers unlawfully searched Plaintiff's car, arrested Plaintiff, and transported to 47th Precinct, then Central Booking, and remained in custody for 24 hours.

Taveras, Katherine vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 303347/2016, Supreme Court - Bronx, November 1, 2016

Ospina, Daniel vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 025614/2016E, Supreme Court - Bronx, August 23, 2016, ended January 4, 2018
$35,000 Settlement

Wells, Trovon vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 300539/2016, Supreme Court - Bronx, July 8, 2016

Benjamin, Daysha vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 15CV08160, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, October 20, 2015, ended April 21, 2016
$5,001 Settlement
Complaint
Description: While Plaintiff was a passenger in a car her friend was driving, defendant officers stopped the car and allegedly found a gun, ammunition and marijuana in Kiture's possession and arrested him. Plaintiff was arrested as well, taken to the 43rd Precinct, and charged with possession of a weapon, ammunition and marijuana. Plaintiff was sent to Rikers because she couldn't post bail and strip-searched. All charges were eventually dismissed

Other Documents