Peter Kim

Badge #23537, Asian Male
Police Officer at 61st Precinct since September 2021, active
Also served at US Open Tennis Detail
Service started July 2017, made $103,000 last year, Tax #964092

Substantiated Allegations:
Force: Gun Pointed (2)
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card

Complaints

2 Complaints
10 Allegations
3 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
2 Substantiated (Charges)
3 Unable to Determine
1 Unfounded
3 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202107861, December 2021
Allegation: Force: Gun Pointed
Complainant: White Male, 15-17
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property
Complainant: White Male, 10-14
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Force: Gun Pointed
Complainant: White Male, 10-14
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: White Male, 10-14
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: White Male, 15-17
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: White Male, 15-17
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: White Male, 10-14
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: White Male, 15-17
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: White Male, 10-14
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details

Complaint #202104670, August 2021
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint
Complainant: White Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
additional details

Complaint #202107861, December 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Gun Pointed White Male, 15-17 Substantiated (Charges)
Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property White Male, 10-14 Within NYPD Guidelines
Force: Gun Pointed White Male, 10-14 Substantiated (Charges)
Abuse of Authority: Frisk White Male, 10-14 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Frisk White Male, 15-17 Unable to Determine
Discourtesy: Word White Male, 15-17 Within NYPD Guidelines
Discourtesy: Word White Male, 10-14 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) White Male, 15-17 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card White Male, 10-14 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details
Complaint #202104670, August 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint White Male, 35-39 Unable to Determine
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusion definitions.