Stanley Ng

Badge #4496, Asian Male
Sergeant at 94th Precinct since August 2022
Also served at Emergency Services Unit, Critical Response Command, Emergency Service Squad 04
Service started July 2010, made $146,000 last year, Tax #949392

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2023-29320
Closed: 5/3/2024
Case: 2012-8605
Closed: 5/28/2015
Document

View Details

Complaints

6 Complaints
9 Allegations
1 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
1 Complainant Uncooperative
1 SRAD Closure
4 Unsubstantiated
2 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202602706, February 2026
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint
Complainant: Black Male, 65-69
CCRB Conclusion: SRAD Closure
additional details

Complaint #202310932, November 2023
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: White Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #202304476, May 2023
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #202303538, April 2023
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: White Male, 60-64
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #202204338, June 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises
Complainant: American Indian Female, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details

Complaint #202003737, May 2020
Allegation: Force: Nightstick as club (incl asp & baton)
Complainant: White Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Force: Nightstick as club (incl asp & baton)
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Force: Other blunt instrument as a club
Complainant: White Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #202602706, February 2026
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint Black Male, 65-69 SRAD Closure
additional details
Complaint #202310932, November 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force White Male, 25-29 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #202304476, May 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Hispanic Male, 30-34 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #202303538, April 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force White Male, 60-64 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #202204338, June 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises American Indian Female, 35-39 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details
Complaint #202003737, May 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Nightstick as club (incl asp & baton) White Male, 21-24 Unsubstantiated
Force: Nightstick as club (incl asp & baton) Unsubstantiated
Force: Other blunt instrument as a club White Male, 21-24 Unsubstantiated
Force: Physical force Unsubstantiated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'SRAD Closure': Strategic Resource Allocation Determination - due to citywide budget cuts, CCRB is no longer able to fully investigate certain cases within its jurisdiction and suspended investigating some types of complaints.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Discipline

Case: 2023-29320
Closed: 5/3/2024
Case Details:
  1. Wrongful search of a premises.
Recommendation: Training

Case: 2012-8605
Document
Opened: 3/11/2014
Closed: 5/28/2015
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: Having responded to an incident failed to conduct a proper investigation including identifying and interviewing witnesses and safeguarding evidence
Penalty: Forfeiture of ten vacation days


Other Documents

Employment History Summary