Dyshawn M. Pitt
Badge #2319,
Black Male
Sergeant at Patrol Borough Manhattan South since March 2025
Also served at
1st Precinct
Service
started July 2010,
made $136,000 last year,
Tax #949492
Complaints
1
Complaint
1
Allegation
0
Substantiated
1
SRAD Closure
Complaint #202412198,
November 2024
additional details
| Allegation: | Discourtesy: Word |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Male, 35-39 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | SRAD Closure |
| Complaint #202412198, November 2024 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Discourtesy: Word | Male, 35-39 | SRAD Closure |
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'SRAD Closure': Strategic Resource Allocation Determination - due to citywide budget cuts, CCRB is no longer able to fully investigate certain cases within its jurisdiction and suspended investigating some types of complaints.
Further details on conclusions.
Discipline
Case: 2016-15190
Closed: 5/10/2016
Case Details:
- Guilty: While off-duty engaged in a physical altercation with a person known to the Department.
- Guilty: While off-duty, and after having been involved in a physical altercation , failed to promptly notify the New York City Police Department's operations unit as required.
- Guilty: While off-duty, damaged the property of a person known to the Department.
- Guilty: While off-duty, engaged in a physical altercation with a person known to the Department.
Penalty: Pre-trial suspension days (32 days)
Lawsuits
Thomas, Shawn Randall vs City of Ny, et al.Case # 24CV02534, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, September 20, 2024
Complaint
Description: On December11th, 2022, within Plaintiff's hotel room, at 55 Church St., NY, NY, Plaintiff was the victim of theft and assault. Minutes later, four members of the NYPD, including Defendants arrived at Plaintiff's hotel room. Plaintiff was contained in his room, and interviewed by Defendants while assaulter Watkins was taken out and interviewed in the hallway and her hotel room. Defendant Pitt arrived and eventually ordered Rigsang to arrest Plaintiff. Plaintiff was handcuffed and arrested. Pitt instructed Rigsang to interview Watkins to obtain probable cause for plaintiff's arrest. Rigsang interviewed Watkins and within minutes determined there was no probable cause for arrest. Rigsang communicated to Pitt there...