Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
Further details on conclusions.
Case: 2010-2183
Closed: 8/6/2010
Case Details:
-
Guilty:
Unfit for duty due to the consumption of an intoxicant.
-
Guilty:
Unfit for duty. While armed..
Penalty: Counseling, dismissal probation (12 months), ordered breath testing, vacation days (30 days)
Baez v. The City of New York et al
Case # 08CV10604,
U.S. District Court - Southern District NY
$215,000 Settlement
Amended Complaint,
Stipulation
Description: Defendant Officer arrested Plaintiff in connection with a brawl that had recently taken place nearby and coercively interrogated him until late the next night and put him into a suggestive lineup, until Plaintiff decided to falsely confess. Plaintiff was charged with Murder in the Second Degree, Manslaughter in the First Degree, and Gang Assault in the First Degree. He was indicted on lesser charges and held at Rikers for 5 months until all his charges were eventually dismissed.