Widny Cylet

Badge #25349, Black Male
Police Officer at Strategic Response Group 3 Brooklyn since August 2019, active
Also served at Police Service Area 9
Service started July 2006, made $128,000 last year, Tax #942703

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2018-19755
Closed: 3/22/2019

View Details

Complaints

1 Complaint
2 Allegations
0 Substantiated
2 Complainant Unavailable

Complaint #201406859, June 2014
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 44
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
Allegation: Force: Chokehold
Complainant: Black Male, 44
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
additional details

Complaint #201406859, June 2014
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 44 Complainant Unavailable
Force: Chokehold Black Male, 44 Complainant Unavailable
additional details

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2018-19755
Closed: 3/22/2019
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: Wrongfully unholstered a firearm.
  2. Guilty: Violated uniform rules/armed without a shield.
  3. Guilty: Violated firearms maintenance rules.
Penalty: Vacation days (30 days)


Lawsuits

Named in 2 known lawsuits.

Scott, Don A. vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 003562/2015, Supreme Court - Queens, March 30, 2015, ended February 7, 2019
Administrative Closing

Matthews, Carliek vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 14CV00637, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, February 5, 2014, ended December 17, 2015
Zero Disposition
Complaint
Description: On or about November 12, 2012, Plaintiff was sitting outside with his girlfriend on the stoop of his girlfriend's building, when officers Widny Cylet, Phillip Picciano, Christian Rodriguez, and 3 unnamed officers approached him. The officers immediately searched Plaintiff, took his car keys and proceeded to search his car. After failing to find anything illegal or unlawful, they arrested Plaintiff for trespassing, although Plaintiff and his girlfriend made it clear his girlfriend resided in the building. The officers later falsely charged Plaintiff with possession of a controlled substance instead of trespassing since they were able to verity that Plaintiff was not trespassing. Plaintiff was detained in the pre...

Other Documents