Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
Further details on conclusion definitions.
Named in 5 known lawsuits.
Barrett, Clover M. vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 22CV01658,
U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, June 30, 2022
Complaint
Description: On August 18, 2018, Carmen Pacheco and Betty Lugo called 911 and falsely reported to several police officers that Clover M. Barrett cut and removed their metal fence and stone from their property. The responding NYPD officers investigated the complaint and deemed it to be a civil dispute. Pacheco and Lugo went to the 84th Precinct and generated a new complaint with the help of Officer Michael Hidalgo reiterating their false statements. On August 30, 2018, Officer Raymond White informed Barrett that he had to arrest her. Officer White stated that he was not going to arrest Barrett at the time but wanted to if he could since he knew where she lived and worked. Officer White and the NYPD knew there was no probabl...
Barrett, Clover M. vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 526654/2019,
Supreme Court - Kings, February 27, 2020
Bledsoe, Dairon vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 014249/2014,
Supreme Court - Kings, October 7, 2014
Jones, Donje vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 001220/2014,
Supreme Court - Kings, February 6, 2014
King v. The City of New York et al
Case # 16CV00306,
U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY
complaint,
Amended Complaint
Description: Defendant Officers stopped Plaintiff outside in his neighborhood. They forcibly grabbed, searched and arrested Plaintiff. They found no contraband but brought plaintiff into PSA2 for arrest. He was charged with promoting gambling in the second degree. The charge was later adjourned in contemplation of dismissal. At Plaintiff's October 23 Court appearance, Defendant Officers stopped the plaintiff, searched him, and removed him from the Court to take him to the 73rd precinct. After forcing the Plaintiff to appear in multiple lineups, the Officers eventually released him.