Michelle K. Murray

Michelle K. Murray

Michelle K. Murray
Badge #5466, White Female
Sergeant at 20th Precinct since March 2025
Service started July 2014, made $146,000 last year, Tax #956903

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card

Lawsuit Settlements:
$85,000   Musa, Rabab vs City of New York et al., 2017 NYCSC NYCSC 151601/2017
View Details

Complaints

2 Complaints
4 Allegations
1 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
1 Complainant Uncooperative
2 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202408012, August 2024
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
Complainant: Female, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises
Complainant: Female, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: White Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
additional details

Complaint #201806222, July 2018
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
Complainant: Female, 29
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #202408012, August 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Female, 35-39 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises Female, 35-39 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card White Male, 35-39 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
additional details
Complaint #201806222, July 2018
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number Female, 29 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Lawsuits

Musa, Rabab vs City of New York et al.
Case # 151601/2017, Supreme Court - New York, February 27, 2017, ended February 8, 2018
$85,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On September 6, 2016, Plaintiff was unlawfully arrested as she left Starbucks to go home to her waiting family. Plaintiff was approached by two officers who demanded to see her identification, without justification. The officers proceeded to handcuff her without legal justification. Plaintiff was taken to, upon information and belief, Midtown South precinct where she was invasively searched. Plaintiff practices the Islamic faith and wears a hijab as part of her religious practice. Plaintiff was forced to remove the hijab in violation of her rights and the hijab was confiscated. Plaintiff was detained for several hours in the prescient, and was denied the right to call her worried family and tell them where she ...