Jose L. Ortiz

Badge #4474, Hispanic Male

Detective Grade 1 at 67th Precinct Detective Squad since June 2013

Also served at 69th Precinct

Service started July 2001, made $188,000 last year, Tax #928903

Complaints

7 Complaints

12 Allegations

0 Substantiated

1 Complaint Withdrawn

1 SRAD Closure

2 Unable to Determine

8 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #202411520, November 2024

Allegation:	Discourtesy: Action
Complainant:	Asian Female
CCRB Conclusion:	SRAD Closure

additional details

Complaint #202308402, September 2023

Allegation:	Offensive Language: Gender
Complainant:	Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion:	Unable to Determine
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Action
Complainant:	Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion:	Unable to Determine

additional details

Complaint #201600994, January 2016

Allegation:	Force: Physical force
Complainant:	Black Male, 55
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated

additional details

Complaint #200716872, November 2007

Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
Complainant:	Male, 24
CCRB Conclusion:	Complaint Withdrawn

additional details

Complaint #200712258, August 2007

Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant:	Black Male, 12
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Question
Complainant:	Black Male, 12
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant:	Black Male, 15
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant:	Black Male, 15
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated

additional details

Complaint #200616515, December 2006

Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop
Complainant:	Black Male, 58
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant:	Black Male, 58
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated

additional details

Complaint #200613493, October 2006

Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Other
Complainant:	Black Male, 26
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated

additional details

Complaint #202411520, November 2024
Allegation	Complainant	CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Action	Asian Female	SRAD Closure
additional details
Complaint #202308402, September 2023
Allegation	Complainant	CCRB Conclusion
Offensive Language: Gender	Black Male, 25-29	Unable to Determine
Discourtesy: Action	Black Male, 25-29	Unable to Determine
additional details
Complaint #201600994, January 2016
Allegation	Complainant	CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force	Black Male, 55	Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #200716872, November 2007
Allegation	Complainant	CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word	Male, 24	Complaint Withdrawn
additional details
Complaint #200712258, August 2007
Allegation	Complainant	CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Stop	Black Male, 12	Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Question	Black Male, 12	Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)	Black Male, 15	Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Frisk	Black Male, 15	Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #200616515, December 2006
Allegation	Complainant	CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop	Black Male, 58	Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)	Black Male, 58	Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #200613493, October 2006
Allegation	Complainant	CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Other	Black Male, 26	Unsubstantiated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'SRAD Closure': Strategic Resource Allocation Determination - due to citywide budget cuts, CCRB is no longer able to fully investigate certain cases within its jurisdiction and suspended investigating some types of complaints.

'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusions.

Lawsuits

Bellony, Bernard vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 18CV05127, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, September 20, 2018, ended June 18, 2019
Zero Disposition
Complaint
Description: On June 13, 2016, a shooting took place at a playground in Brooklyn. Plaintiff had nothing to do with this. Nonetheless, defendant police officers manufactured evidence and altered witness testimony causing plaintiff to be falsely arrested and incarcerated for one year, two months and 23 days. Additionally, plaintiff was libeled and defamed in newspapers citywide. All charges against plaintiff were dismissed on January 8, 2018.

Jose L. Ortiz

Complaints

Conclusion Meanings:

Lawsuits

Other Documents