Christophe Mitchell

Badge #1780, Black Male
Former Detective Grade 3 at Narcotics Borough Queens South
Service started July 1996, ended August 2016, Tax #918013

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Frisk and/or search
Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop (2)
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search

Complaints

6 Complaints
8 Allegations
4 Substantiated
3 Substantiated (Charges)
1 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
1 Complainant Uncooperative
1 Exonerated
1 Unfounded
1 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #201411517, November 2014
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: Female, 53
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
additional details

Complaint #201006561, May 2010
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Female, 49
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #200912104, August 2009
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 18
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #200805905, April 2008
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Female, 31
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #200508287, July 2005
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Male
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #200306474, August 2003
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop
Complainant: White Male, 43
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop
Complainant: Black Female, 45
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk and/or search
Complainant: Black Female, 45
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Penalty: Command Discipline - A
additional details

Complaint #201411517, November 2014
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Female, 53 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
additional details
Complaint #201006561, May 2010
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Black Female, 49 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #200912104, August 2009
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 18 Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #200805905, April 2008
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Female, 31 Unfounded
additional details
Complaint #200508287, July 2005
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Male Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #200306474, August 2003
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop White Male, 43 Substantiated (Charges)
Abuse of Authority: Question and/or stop Black Female, 45 Substantiated (Charges)
Abuse of Authority: Frisk and/or search Black Female, 45 Substantiated (Charges)
Penalty: Command Discipline - A
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusions.


Lawsuits

Cintron, Jaquan vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 155333/2018, Supreme Court - New York, July 6, 2018
Complaint
Description: On or about September 15, 2018, several unknown Defendant NYPD officers broke into an apartment to which Plaintiff was a guest without a valid search warrant, probable cause, consent, or reasonable suspicion. The Defendant officers stated that they were looking for drugs and guns. The Defendant officers arrested Plaintiff and took him to the precinct where he was processed. While Plaintiff was at the precinct, the Defendant officers made false statements to the District Attorney's Office about Plaintiff. All charges against the Plaintiff were eventually dismissed.