Oliver J. Muir
Badge #5809,
White Male
Also served at
62nd Precinct
Service
started July 1998, ended March 2024,
Tax #921613
Complaints
2
Complaints
3
Allegations
0
Substantiated
1
Unfounded
2
Unsubstantiated
Complaint #200807733,
May 2008
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Stop |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Hispanic Male, 36 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unsubstantiated |
Complaint #200611582,
August 2006
additional details
| Allegation: | Discourtesy: Word |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | White Female, 21 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| Allegation: | Offensive Language: Ethnicity |
| Complainant: | White Female, 21 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unsubstantiated |
| Complaint #200807733, May 2008 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Stop | Hispanic Male, 36 | Unsubstantiated |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #200611582, August 2006 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Discourtesy: Word | White Female, 21 | Unfounded |
| Offensive Language: Ethnicity | White Female, 21 | Unsubstantiated |
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
Further details on conclusions.
Lawsuits
Named in 3 known lawsuits.Torres, Herbert vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 518295/2025, Supreme Court - Kings, June 4, 2025
Chan, Yu Hin & Gu, Feifei vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 25CV00029, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, March 18, 2025
Complaint
Fina, Vincent vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 504209/2022, Supreme Court - Kings, March 16, 2022, ended November 12, 2025
Administrative Closing
Complaint
Description: On February 13, 2019, at 4:30a.m., Plaintiff and his wife were asleep inside of their room at the Auburn Shelter when defendant officers, including OLIVER MUIR, DAVID RODRIGUEZ, PIERCE, MOLLEUR and other unknown police officers, burst into Plaintiff’s room with their firearms drawn and pointed at Plaintiff and his wife without warrant, probable cause or any legal justification. Plaintiff was then immediately handcuffed and placed under arrest. Plaintiff was informed he was being arrested for a robbery. No proceeds of any alleged robbery were found in Plaintiff’s possession or in the room where he was arrested. Plaintiff was maliciously prosecuted for a crime he did not commit whereas Defendants had the proof ...