Daniel Mardjonovic

Badge #6391, White Male, 39
Police Officer at Narcotics Borough Bronx since May 2023
Also served at 40th Precinct
Service started July 2013, made $138,000 last year, Tax #955123

Substantiated Allegations:
Force: Physical force
Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera (2)
Abuse of Authority: Stop

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2024-30458
Closed: 5/15/2024
Closed: 4/29/2024
Case: 1 Allegation

View Details

Lawsuit settlements:
$25,000   Delgado, Jarrett vs City of New York, 2021 BCSC BCSC 814092/2021E
$453,733   Belle, Terron, et al. vs City of New York, et al., 2019 SDNY SDNY 19CV02673
View Details

Complaints

5 Complaints
12 Allegations
5 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Charges)
4 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Alleged Victim Unavailable
3 Unable to Determine
1 Unfounded
1 Unsubstantiated
1 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202308863, September 2023
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Alleged Victim Unavailable
additional details

Complaint #202304876, December 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Complainant: Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Penalty: Command Discipline - A
additional details

Complaint #202208298, December 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Other
Complainant: Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Complainant: Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details

Complaint #202204225, June 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Black Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Black Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #201705989, July 2017
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 29
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
NYPD Conclusion: APU Not guilty
APU Case Status: Closed: Not guilty after trial, April 2019
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #202308863, September 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 45-49 Alleged Victim Unavailable
additional details
Complaint #202304876, December 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Male, 18-20 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Penalty: Command Discipline - A
additional details
Complaint #202208298, December 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Male, 18-20 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Stop Male, 18-20 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Discourtesy: Word Male, 18-20 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Male, 18-20 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Other Male, 18-20 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Male, 18-20 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details
Complaint #202204225, June 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Black Male, 21-24 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Black Male, 21-24 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #201705989, July 2017
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 29 Substantiated (Charges)
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 29 Unsubstantiated
NYPD Conclusion: APU Not guilty
APU Case Status: Closed: Not guilty after trial, April 2019
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2024-30458
Closed: 5/15/2024
Case Details:
  1. Failed to activate their body worn camera.
  2. Wrongfully frisked an individual known to the Department.
  3. Wrongfully stopped an individual known to the Department.
Recommendation: Command Discipline - B

Closed: 4/29/2024
Case Details:
  1. Failed to activate their body worn camera.
Penalty: A - Command Discipline, training
Recommendation: A-CD, training


Lawsuits

Named in 6 known lawsuits, $478,733 total settlements.

Ross, Dimon et Al, vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 812138/2023E, Supreme Court - Bronx, October 26, 2023

Williams, Joshia, et al. vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 811751/2023E, Supreme Court - Bronx, August 8, 2023

Beltre, Devon, et al. vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 801088/2023E, Supreme Court - Bronx, January 30, 2023

Roberts, Paris vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 817983/2022E, Supreme Court - Bronx, December 2, 2022
Complaint
Description: That on or about September 25, 2021, Plaintiff was hanging out with some friends in Bronx when he was stopped, handcuffed and arrested by Defendants Andrei Nijnic, Daniel Mardjonovic & other unknown police officers without probable cause or any other legal justification. Plaintiff did not possess any alcohol, contraband, weapon or any illegal object. Plaintiff was falsely prosecuted and spent numerous days in custody. The matter was dismissed upon application of the Office of the Bronx District Attorney

Delgado, Jarrett vs City of New York
Case # 814092/2021E, Supreme Court - Bronx, October 18, 2021, ended March 2, 2022
$25,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On October 2, 2020, Plaintiff was approached by P.O.s including Officers Daniel Mardjonovic and Benito Cruz and stopped, searched, grabbed, assaulted, battered, and detained. In the course of the arrest, Plaintiff was handled in an egregious manner and experienced injury to the head, neck, back, body and limbs. Plaintiff was subjected to a strip search and remained incarcerated for over 24 hours. After being prosecuted on false charges, all charges against Plaintiff were terminated favorably.

Belle, Terron, et al. vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 19CV02673, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, March 27, 2019, ended December 14, 2022
$453,733 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On various dates in 2017-2019, Plaintiffs, who represent a class of similarly situated individuals, were unlawfully stopped and searched by P.O.s Brian Destefano, Daniel Mardjonovic, Steven Barry, and John Does 1-50 without probable cause. Plaintiffs challenge the NYPD's unconstitutional policy of detaining people for the purpose of conducting a search of the NYPD's internal and external databases without individualized reasonable suspicion. These unwarranted digital searches disproportionately target people of color without being reasonably related to actual criminal activity.

Other Documents