Humberto Josephdelgado

Humberto Josephdelgado

Humberto Josephdelgado
Badge #7794, Hispanic Male
Police Officer at 72nd Precinct since March 2021
Service started October 2019, made $108,000 last year, Tax #968523

Substantiated Allegations:
Force: Physical force (2)
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Abuse of Authority: False official statement
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Abuse of Authority: Threat re: removal to hospital
Discourtesy: Word
Untruthful Statement: False official statement

Complaints

7 Complaints
20 Allegations
9 Substantiated
2 Substantiated (Charges)
4 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
3 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
3 Closed - Pending Litigation
1 Complainant Uncooperative
2 SRAD Closure
2 Unable to Determine
3 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202512286, December 2025
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
Allegation: Force: Hit against inanimate object
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details

Complaint #202509723, September 2025
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: White Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: SRAD Closure
additional details

Complaint #202503137, March 2025
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: SRAD Closure
additional details

Complaint #202400166, January 2024
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Age 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Age 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Age 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Age 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Age 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Age 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Age 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Age 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Age 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat re: removal to hospital
Complainant: Age 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Untruthful Statement: False official statement
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: False official statement
Complainant: Age 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details

Complaint #202304504, May 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property
Complainant: Black Female, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #202208466, December 2022
Allegation: Discourtesy: Action
Complainant: Black, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #202203389, May 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #202512286, December 2025
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 25-29 Closed - Pending Litigation
Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording Hispanic Male, 25-29 Closed - Pending Litigation
Force: Hit against inanimate object Hispanic Male, 25-29 Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details
Complaint #202509723, September 2025
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest White Male, 35-39 SRAD Closure
additional details
Complaint #202503137, March 2025
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 30-34 SRAD Closure
additional details
Complaint #202400166, January 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Age 45-49 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Force: Physical force Age 45-49 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Age 45-49 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Age 45-49 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Discourtesy: Word Age 45-49 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Stop Age 45-49 Within NYPD Guidelines
Force: Physical force Age 45-49 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Discourtesy: Word Age 45-49 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Age 45-49 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Threat re: removal to hospital Age 45-49 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Untruthful Statement: False official statement Substantiated (Charges)
Abuse of Authority: False official statement Age 45-49 Substantiated (Charges)
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details
Complaint #202304504, May 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property Black Female, 30-34 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #202208466, December 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Action Black, 30-34 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #202203389, May 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Black Male, 35-39 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'SRAD Closure': Strategic Resource Allocation Determination - due to citywide budget cuts, CCRB is no longer able to fully investigate certain cases within its jurisdiction and suspended investigating some types of complaints.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Lawsuits

Leger, Abdolph A. vs Hecht, John, et al.
Case # 25CV02418, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, April 20, 2026