Steven L. Jandly
Badge #1562,
White Male
Sergeant at 105th Precinct since September 2025
Service
started July 2015,
made $152,000 last year,
Tax #958723
Complaints
6
Complaints
11
Allegations
0
Substantiated
1
Closed - Pending Litigation
1
Exonerated
2
SRAD Closure
7
Unsubstantiated
Complaint #202509309,
August 2025
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | White Male, 35-39 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | SRAD Closure |
Complaint #202411755,
November 2024
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Female, 30-34 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | SRAD Closure |
Complaint #202005707,
August 2020
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Female, 50-54 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unsubstantiated |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name |
| Complainant: | Black Female, 50-54 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unsubstantiated |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number |
| Complainant: | Black Female, 50-54 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unsubstantiated |
| Allegation: | Offensive Language: Race |
| Complainant: | Black Female, 50-54 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unsubstantiated |
| Allegation: | Offensive Language: Gender |
| Complainant: | Black Female, 50-54 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unsubstantiated |
Complaint #201806172,
July 2018
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male, 58 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unsubstantiated |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 58 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unsubstantiated |
Complaint #201805746,
July 2018
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male, 16 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Closed - Pending Litigation |
Complaint #201604415,
May 2016
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched |
|---|---|
| CCRB Conclusion: | Exonerated |
| Complaint #202509309, August 2025 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest | White Male, 35-39 | SRAD Closure |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202411755, November 2024 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest | Female, 30-34 | SRAD Closure |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202005707, August 2020 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Physical force | Black Female, 50-54 | Unsubstantiated |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name | Black Female, 50-54 | Unsubstantiated |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number | Black Female, 50-54 | Unsubstantiated |
| Offensive Language: Race | Black Female, 50-54 | Unsubstantiated |
| Offensive Language: Gender | Black Female, 50-54 | Unsubstantiated |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #201806172, July 2018 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital | Black Male, 58 | Unsubstantiated |
| Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint | Black Male, 58 | Unsubstantiated |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #201805746, July 2018 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Physical force | Black Male, 16 | Closed - Pending Litigation |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #201604415, May 2016 | ||
| Allegation | CCRB Conclusion | |
| Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched | Exonerated | |
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'SRAD Closure': Strategic Resource Allocation Determination - due to citywide budget cuts, CCRB is no longer able to fully investigate certain cases within its jurisdiction and suspended investigating some types of complaints.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
Further details on conclusions.