Scott R. Hujber

Badge #1148, White Male
Former Police Officer at Patrol Borough Manhattan North
Also served at 25th Precinct, Patrol Borough Manhattan North Task Force
Service started July 2004, ended June 2025, Tax #935033


Lawsuit Settlements:
$10,000   Farlow, Adrian vs City of New York, et al., 2013 NYCSC NYCSC 152826/2013
View Details

Complaints

3 Complaints
6 Allegations
0 Substantiated
2 Exonerated
1 Unfounded
3 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #200813071, September 2008
Allegation: Discourtesy: Action
Complainant: Black Male, 45
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Offensive Language: Race
Complainant: Black Male, 45
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property
Complainant: Black Male, 45
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #200807178, May 2008
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 25
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 25
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #200700288, January 2007
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 41
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #200813071, September 2008
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Action Black Male, 45 Unsubstantiated
Offensive Language: Race Black Male, 45 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property Black Male, 45 Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #200807178, May 2008
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 25 Exonerated
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 25 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #200700288, January 2007
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 41 Unfounded
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusions.


Discipline

Case: 2009-210
Opened: 12/21/2009
Closed: 1/7/2013
Case Details:
  1. Dismissed: Wrongfully searched a vehicle without sufficient legal authority
  2. Guilty: Wrongfully issued an improper summons
  3. Guilty: Entered inaccurate information on a criminal court summons
  4. Guilty: Having been made aware on an allegation of misconduct against another member of the Department, failed to notify the Internal Affairs Bureau
  5. Guilty: Wrongfully provided inaccurate and misleading statements during and official civilian complaint review board interview
Penalty: Dismissal from the New York Police Department; however, judgment is suspended and respondent will be placed on dismissal probation for a period of one (1) year. Forfeiture of thirty (30) vacation days.


Lawsuits

Farlow, Adrian vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 152826/2013, Supreme Court - New York, April 11, 2013, ended June 17, 2014
$10,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On or about January 8, 2008, at approximately 7:00pm, Plaintiff was sitting in his double parked car with a friend. Plaintiff's car was properly licensed, registered, and inspected, displaying proper certification. Plaintiff also had a valid driver's license and did not operate his car recklessly or in a manner justifying a police stop or questioning. Defendants Eiseman and Hujber were driving up the street when they noticed officers from the 32nd Precinct stop to address a fight between a man and a woman. Defendants Eiseman and Hujber stopped to assist with the fight, but instead walked to Plaintiff's car. Plaintiff was not involved in the fight and was just sitting in the driver's seat of his car. Defendant...

Other Documents