Conclusion Meanings:
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusions.
Named in 3 known lawsuits.
Centry, Shalaysia O. vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 826426/2025E,
Supreme Court - Bronx, January 20, 2026
Roundtree, My'asha vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 811870/2021E,
Supreme Court - Bronx, September 22, 2021
Complaint
Description: On May 26, 2020, Plaintiff My'Asha Roundtree's apartment was entered by Defendant NYPD Police Officers without a warrant seeking to arrest Plaintiff over allegations of misdemeanor assault. Plaintiff arranged to turn herself in two days later at the 47th Precinct. While in a holding cell, plaintiff was denied a change, food and water, and the ability to make a call to her attorney by Lanay Reyes, Winghong Lau, Rosibel Kery, First Name Unknown Nunez, and First Name Unknown Herena. Plaintiff was also thrown headfirst into the NYPD transport van.
Plaintiff brings claims of: assault and battery, negligent hiring, retention, training and supervision, failure to intervene, respondeat superior, excessive force, delib...
Daniels, Quatrell vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 802673/2021,
Supreme Court - Bronx, February 26, 2021
Complaint
Description: On or around February 21, 2020 at around 10:30PM, Plaintiff Quatrell Daniels was accosted by multiple NYPD Officers while on a Bronx street. These officers, which included Officers Abdelhadi Aanouz and Nicholas Santomero as well as some Unidentified Officers, beat the Plaintiff and dragged him on the ground. As a result of the excessive force deployed by the Defendants, Plaintiff Daniels suffered injuries to his face and head. Plaintiff was cuffed and brought to the 47th Precinct, where he was charged with crimes he did not commit. The Officers did not have a warrant or any reasonable cause or grounds to believe that Plaintiff was guilty of a crime, and Plaintiff Daniels did not resist the arrest.
While at ...