Michaelangelo Hidalgo

Michaelangelo Hidalgo

Michaelangelo Hidalgo
Badge #497, Hispanic Male
Sergeant at Transit Bureau District 30 since July 2024
Service started January 2005, made $182,000 last year, Tax #936043

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Discourtesy: Word

Discipline Cases:

Closed: 9/20/2024
Case: 1 Allegation
Case: 2022-26557
Closed: 8/25/2022

View Details

Complaints

10 Complaints
18 Allegations
3 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Charges)
1 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
3 Complainant Unavailable
1 Complainant Uncooperative
1 Exonerated
6 Unfounded
4 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #202105515, February 2021
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Penalty: Command Discipline - A
additional details

Complaint #201809680, November 2018
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property
Complainant: Black Male, 56
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #201212257, September 2012
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Black Male, 43
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #201208532, July 2012
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Female
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #200914139, August 2009
Allegation: Force: Handcuffs too tight
Complainant: Black Male, 27
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 27
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property
Complainant: Black Male, 27
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
additional details

Complaint #200812393, August 2008
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Complainant: Black Male, 22
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Property damaged
Complainant: Black Male, 22
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #200811569, July 2008
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Black Male, 61
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Black Male, 61
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #200809828, July 2008
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: White Female, 39
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Penalty: Instructions
additional details

Complaint #200806633, May 2008
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: White Female, 17
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #200509744, August 2005
Allegation: Offensive Language: Race
Complainant: Black Male, 21
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Complainant: Black Male, 21
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Property damaged
Complainant: Black Male, 21
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #202105515, February 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 30-34 Exonerated
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 30-34 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Black Male, 30-34 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Penalty: Command Discipline - A
additional details
Complaint #201809680, November 2018
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat to damage/seize property Black Male, 56 Unsubstantiated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #201212257, September 2012
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Black Male, 43 Unfounded
additional details
Complaint #201208532, July 2012
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Female Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #200914139, August 2009
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Handcuffs too tight Black Male, 27 Complainant Unavailable
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 27 Complainant Unavailable
Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property Black Male, 27 Complainant Unavailable
additional details
Complaint #200812393, August 2008
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Black Male, 22 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Property damaged Black Male, 22 Unfounded
additional details
Complaint #200811569, July 2008
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Black Male, 61 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Black Male, 61 Unsubstantiated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #200809828, July 2008
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest White Female, 39 Substantiated (Charges)
Penalty: Instructions
additional details
Complaint #200806633, May 2008
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest White Female, 17 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #200509744, August 2005
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Offensive Language: Race Black Male, 21 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Black Male, 21 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Property damaged Black Male, 21 Unfounded
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusions.


Discipline

Closed: 9/20/2024
Case Details:
  1. Made computer inquiries unrelated to official Department business.
Penalty: B - Command Discipline, vacation days (8 days)
Recommendation: Command Discipline - B

Case: 2022-26557
Closed: 8/25/2022
Case Details:
  1. Violated patrol rules - refused to provide shield number
  2. Wrongfully discourteous to an individual known to the Department.
Penalty: A - Command Discipline
Recommendation: Command Discipline - A


Lawsuits

Named in 2 known lawsuits.

Barrett, Clover M. vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 22CV01658, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, June 30, 2022
Complaint
Description: On August 18, 2018, Carmen Pacheco and Betty Lugo called 911 and falsely reported to several police officers that Clover M. Barrett cut and removed their metal fence and stone from their property. The responding NYPD officers investigated the complaint and deemed it to be a civil dispute. Pacheco and Lugo went to the 84th Precinct and generated a new complaint with the help of Officer Michael Hidalgo reiterating their false statements. On August 30, 2018, Officer Raymond White informed Barrett that he had to arrest her. Officer White stated that he was not going to arrest Barrett at the time but wanted to if he could since he knew where she lived and worked. Officer White and the NYPD knew there was no probabl...

Barrett, Clover M. vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 526654/2019, Supreme Court - Kings, February 27, 2020
Complaint
Description: On or about September 7th, 2018, Plaintiff was unlawfully detained and arrested by PO Raymond White and PO Micheal Hidalgo. Plaintiff had not committed nor attempted to commit any illegal acts. Following the arrest, Plaintiff was transported to the 84th Precinct where she was unlawfully held in NYPD custody for several hours. On or about October 23rd, 2018, PO White and PO Hidalgo instigated the commencement of a criminal prosecution of the Plaintiff. The criminal prosecution against Plaintiff was ultimately dismissed.

Other Documents