Luis A. Matos

Badge #24155, Hispanic Male
Police Officer at Strategic Technology Division since March 2024
Also served at 63rd Precinct, 121st Precinct
Service started January 2017, made $183,000 last year, Tax #963143

Substantiated Allegations:
Force: Physical force

Complaints

4 Complaints
11 Allegations
1 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Charges)
1 Exonerated
1 OMB PEG Directive Closure
2 Unable to Determine
2 Unfounded
4 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202400973, January 2024
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Female, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: OMB PEG Directive Closure
additional details

Complaint #202308317, August 2023
Allegation: Force: Nonlethal restraining device
Complainant: Black Male, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Force: Chokehold
Complainant: Black Male, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Force: Nightstick as club (incl asp & baton)
Complainant: Black Male, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Complainant: Black Male, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
NYPD Conclusion: APU Closed: Retained, without discipline
APU Case Status: Closed: Retained, without discipline, February 21, 2025
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Closing Report
NYPD Case Retained Letter
additional details

Complaint #202201152, February 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
Complainant: Black Female, 60-64
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises
Complainant: Black Female, 60-64
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
additional details

Complaint #201807231, August 2018
Allegation: Force: Hit against inanimate object
Complainant: Black Male, 35
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #202400973, January 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Female, 25-29 OMB PEG Directive Closure
additional details
Complaint #202308317, August 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Nonlethal restraining device Black Male, 45-49 Within NYPD Guidelines
Force: Chokehold Black Male, 45-49 Unfounded
Force: Physical force Black Male, 45-49 Within NYPD Guidelines
Force: Nightstick as club (incl asp & baton) Black Male, 45-49 Unfounded
Force: Physical force Black Male, 45-49 Within NYPD Guidelines
Force: Physical force Black Male, 45-49 Substantiated (Charges)
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Black Male, 45-49 Within NYPD Guidelines
NYPD Conclusion: APU Closed: Retained, without discipline
APU Case Status: Closed: Retained, without discipline, February 21, 2025
Documents: APU Quarterly Report summary
Complaint Closing Report
NYPD Case Retained Letter
additional details
Complaint #202201152, February 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Black Female, 60-64 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises Black Female, 60-64 Unable to Determine
additional details
Complaint #201807231, August 2018
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Hit against inanimate object Black Male, 35 Exonerated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'OMB PEG Directive Closure': Due to citywide budget cuts, CCRB is no longer able to fully investigate certain cases within its jurisdiction and suspended investigating some types of complaints.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.