Anthony V. Arace

Anthony V. Arace

Anthony V. Arace
Badge #317, White Male
Former Police Officer at 44th Precinct
Also served at Intelligence Division
Service started October 2018, ended November 2025, Tax #966443

Complaints

4 Complaints
5 Allegations
0 Substantiated
1 Exonerated
1 Unable to Determine
1 Unsubstantiated
2 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202201986, March 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
additional details

Complaint #202200930, January 2022
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #202200232, January 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 50-54
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #201905282, June 2019
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 36
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Question
Complainant: Black Male, 36
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #202201986, March 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to obtain medical treatment Hispanic Male, 25-29 Unable to Determine
additional details
Complaint #202200930, January 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 40-44 Within NYPD Guidelines
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #202200232, January 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Hispanic Male, 50-54 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #201905282, June 2019
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 36 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Question Black Male, 36 Exonerated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Lawsuits

Named in 2 known lawsuits.

Hill, Christopher vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 800096/2025E, Supreme Court - Bronx, March 28, 2025

Govan, Shoshana vs The City of Ny, et al.
Case # 803372/2024E, Supreme Court - Bronx, March 5, 2024
Complaint
Description: On our about December 8, 2022, Plaintiff was asleep inside her apartment when her ex boyfriend allowed Defendant Police Officers Arace, Barker, Estrella Lopez, Ahn, and John Does to drill holes through her front door lock and kick the door to enter the apartment. Plaintiff has a protective order against her ex boyfriend and Defendant Police Officers knew this. Defendant Police Officers did all of this without inquiry for warrant or probable cause. Plaintiff was unclothed and in bed at the time and requested Defendants to leave for her to get dressed but they refused. She requested a female arresting officer and they also refused. She was then touched and placed in handcuffs without her being dressed. The Poli...

Other Documents