Prachak Leelauva

Prachak Leelauva

Prachak Leelauva
Badge #18973, Asian Male
Police Officer at 102nd Precinct since September 2023
Also served at US Open Tennis Detail
Service started October 2016, made $164,000 last year, Tax #962543

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera

Complaints

3 Complaints
6 Allegations
1 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Complainant Unavailable
1 Complainant Uncooperative
1 Unable to Determine
2 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202503397, March 2025
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Complainant: Male, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Complainant: Black Male, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
additional details

Complaint #202300337, January 2023
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Asian Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #202202259, April 2022
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
additional details

Complaint #202503397, March 2025
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 45-49 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Male, 45-49 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 45-49 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Black Male, 45-49 Unable to Determine
additional details
Complaint #202300337, January 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Asian Male, 30-34 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #202202259, April 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Hispanic Female, 35-39 Complainant Unavailable
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.