Anthony R. Andreani

Badge #3690, White Male
Detective Grade 3 at Warrant Section since March 2024
Service started January 2016, made $171,000 last year, Tax #960453

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises
Discourtesy: Word

Complaints

5 Complaints
9 Allegations
3 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
2 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
1 Complainant Unavailable
1 SRAD Closure
3 Unable to Determine
1 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202512616, December 2025
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Female, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: SRAD Closure
additional details

Complaint #202504615, April 2025
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
Complainant: Female, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises
Complainant: Female, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Black Female, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Female, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details

Complaint #202500693, January 2025
Allegation: Offensive Language: Other
Complainant: White Female, 55-59
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: White Female, 55-59
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
additional details

Complaint #202409117, August 2024
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
Complainant: Female, 50-54
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
additional details

Complaint #202208734, December 2022
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
additional details

Complaint #202512616, December 2025
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Female, 40-44 SRAD Closure
additional details
Complaint #202504615, April 2025
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Female, 25-29 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises Female, 25-29 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Black Female, 25-29 Within NYPD Guidelines
Discourtesy: Word Black Female, 25-29 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details
Complaint #202500693, January 2025
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Offensive Language: Other White Female, 55-59 Unable to Determine
Discourtesy: Word White Female, 55-59 Unable to Determine
additional details
Complaint #202409117, August 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Female, 50-54 Complainant Unavailable
additional details
Complaint #202208734, December 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black, 40-44 Unable to Determine
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'SRAD Closure': Strategic Resource Allocation Determination - due to citywide budget cuts, CCRB is no longer able to fully investigate certain cases within its jurisdiction and suspended investigating some types of complaints.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Lawsuits

Frederick, Akeem vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 509358/2022, Supreme Court - Kings, March 31, 2022
Complaint
Description: On May 12, 2021, while lawfully walking home from his aunt's house near Kingston Avenue and Bergen Street in Kings, NY, the plaintiff was stopped, handcuffed, and arrested by Defendant Andreani and other unknown officers without any legal justification. At no time did the plaintiff engage in any criminal activity or possess a loaded firearm. The defendants falsely accused the plaintiff of possession of a weapon in the second degree and related offenses. After the arrest, the plaintiff was transported to the 77th Precinct, where he underwent searches and scans, and nothing illegal was recovered. From the 77th Precinct, he was transported to a local Kings County hospital to receive treatment for injuries sustaine...

Other Documents