Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
Further details on conclusions.
Named in 4 known lawsuits, $272,000 total settlements.
Tippins, Terrance, et al. vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 15CV05729,
U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, October 19, 2015, ended March 21, 2017
$97,000 Settlement
Complaint,
Original Complaint
Description: Officers showed up at the residence asking Terrance Trippin if they can enter, never giving a reason nor showing a warrant, therefore he refused. Seeing police officers at the door his sister Shantell came to the door to get inside the house and see what was going on once he opened the door officers grabbed him and shoved him to the pavement. They handcuffed him, arrested him never reading him his Miranda rights, and took him to the precinct. Shantell was also grabbed but thanks to neighbors yelling she was pregnant they did not shove her to the ground. Her son witnessed from across the street and came running to aide his mother and he was also grabbed and shoved to the ground and taken to the precinct. Terran...
Medlock, Isaiah an Inf By Mng Medlock, Watisha vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 701095/2014,
Supreme Court - Queens, February 28, 2014, ended September 11, 2018
Zero Disposition
Complaint
Description: On or about February 12, 2013, Plaintiff Infant was falsely accused of sending a threatening email to a teacher, and investigated by school personnel. School personnel then contacted the local police precinct and Defendants Police Officer Callahan and Sargeant Strom interviewed Plaintiff Infant and then falsely arrested him, handcuffing him and embarassingly parading him in front of his peers and teachers in a "perp walk". Plaintiff Infant's mother was never contacted.
Plaintiff Infant was confined, handcuffed to a bar, for about 3 hours at the 103rd Precinct, and compelled to enter into an agreement to cooperate with Adjustment Services. Plaintiff suffered extreme emotional distress and severe physical pain.
Alexander, Michele vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 12CV05915,
U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, December 5, 2012, ended May 21, 2015
$175,000 Settlement
Amended Complaint,
Notice of Settlement
Rigaud, Clifford M. vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 12CV03211,
U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, August 9, 2012, ended March 30, 2018
Zero Disposition
Third Amended Complaint