Substantiated Allegations:
Force: Chokehold
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Force: Chokehold
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Joseph T. Guido
Badge #25638,
White Male
Police Officer at Warrant Section since April 2026
Also served at
Midtown South Precinct
Service
started October 2019,
made $111,000 last year,
Tax #968463
Complaints
3
Complaints
9
Allegations
2
Substantiated
1
Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1
Substantiated (Charges)
1
Unable to Determine
2
Unfounded
4
Within NYPD Guidelines
Complaint #202308779,
September 2023
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Chokehold |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male, 30-34 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Charges) |
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 30-34 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Allegation: | Untruthful Statement: False official statement |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 30-34 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| APU Case Status: | Pending |
| Penalty: | APU - Decision Pending |
Complaint #202207888,
November 2022
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Male, 30-34 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
Complaint #202302649,
November 2022
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male, 30-34 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Allegation: | Force: Hit against inanimate object |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 30-34 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| Allegation: | Discourtesy: Word |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 30-34 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera |
| Complainant: | Male, 30-34 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| NYPD Conclusion: | No Disciplinary Action-DUP |
| Penalty: | No penalty |
| Complaint #202308779, September 2023 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Chokehold | Black Male, 30-34 | Substantiated (Charges) |
| Force: Physical force | Black Male, 30-34 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Untruthful Statement: False official statement | Unable to Determine | |
| Force: Physical force | Black Male, 30-34 | Unfounded |
| APU Case Status: Pending | ||
| Penalty: APU - Decision Pending | ||
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202207888, November 2022 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Physical force | Male, 30-34 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202302649, November 2022 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Physical force | Black Male, 30-34 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Force: Hit against inanimate object | Black Male, 30-34 | Unfounded |
| Discourtesy: Word | Black Male, 30-34 | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera | Male, 30-34 | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP | ||
| Penalty: No penalty | ||
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusions.
Discipline
Case: 2024-30067
Closed: 5/3/2024
Case Details:
- Failed to activate their body worn camera.
Recommendation: Command Discipline - A