Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
Further details on conclusions.
Named in 2 known lawsuits, $55,000 total settlements.
Novick, Sabrina vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 19CV06795,
U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, January 10, 2020, ended August 12, 2021
$25,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On September 12, 2018, Defendant Detective Mcainjohn and four unknown defendant officers invited plaintiff Sabrina Novick to come to her local precinct to assist in their investigation of package thefts from her apartment building. However, when Ms. Novick arrived, she was led into an interrogation room and accused of being the thief herself. Defendant Detective Mcainjohn and the defendant officers locked Ms. Novick in the room, took away her cell phone, and attempted to coerce her into a confession. Ms. Novick's Miranda warnings were never read to her. When Ms. Novick tried to leave the room, Defendant Detective Mcainjohn prevented her from doing so. This stress led Ms. Novick to suffer a panic attack, and she...
Christenson, Beth vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 718332/2018,
Supreme Court - Queens, December 7, 2018, ended March 22, 2022
$30,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On November 6, 2017, at approximately 3:00 p.m., Plaintiff was at the 111th NYPD Precinct in Bayside, Queens, for a matter relating to an alleged incident on November 5, 2017.
Police Officer Stephen McCain and other unnamed officers JOHN/JANE DOE I-V, from the NYPD detained, handcuffed, and searched Plaintiff without probable cause. They approched Plaintiff with their loaded firearms. Officer Defendants arrested Plaintiff and then took her into custody to a police station.
Plaintiff informed the officers multiple times that the complainant, her estranged son, was not a resident of her address, that he had a history of drug use, and had an order of protection against him from herfrom 2016-2017.Plaintiff told...