Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
Michael F. Duquette
Badge #2270,
White Male
Police Officer at Midtown South Precinct since April 2022
Service
started October 2021,
made $96,400 last year,
Tax #973083
Complaints
2
Complaints
18
Allegations
1
Substantiated
1
Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1
Closed - Pending Litigation
10
Unable to Determine
6
Unfounded
Complaint #202309620,
October 2023
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: False official statement |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Hispanic Male, 45-49 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Closed - Pending Litigation |
Complaint #202301614,
February 2023
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male, 50-54 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 50-54 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 50-54 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 50-54 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
| Allegation: | Discourtesy: Word |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 50-54 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| Allegation: | Offensive Language: Gender |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 50-54 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| Allegation: | Discourtesy: Word |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 50-54 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unfounded |
| Allegation: | Offensive Language: Sexual orientation |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 50-54 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
| Allegation: | Discourtesy: Word |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 50-54 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
| Allegation: | Offensive Language: Disability |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 50-54 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
| Allegation: | Discourtesy: Word |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 50-54 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
| Allegation: | Offensive Language: Other |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 50-54 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
| Allegation: | Discourtesy: Word |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 50-54 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
| Allegation: | Discourtesy: Word |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 50-54 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
| Allegation: | Offensive Language: Gender |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 50-54 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
| Allegation: | Discourtesy: Word |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 50-54 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unable to Determine |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera |
| Complainant: | Male, 50-54 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| NYPD Conclusion: | No Disciplinary Action-DUP |
| Penalty: | No penalty |
| Complaint #202309620, October 2023 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: False official statement | Hispanic Male, 45-49 | Closed - Pending Litigation |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202301614, February 2023 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Physical force | Black Male, 50-54 | Unfounded |
| Force: Physical force | Black Male, 50-54 | Unfounded |
| Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest | Black Male, 50-54 | Unfounded |
| Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card | Black Male, 50-54 | Unable to Determine |
| Discourtesy: Word | Black Male, 50-54 | Unfounded |
| Offensive Language: Gender | Black Male, 50-54 | Unfounded |
| Discourtesy: Word | Black Male, 50-54 | Unfounded |
| Offensive Language: Sexual orientation | Black Male, 50-54 | Unable to Determine |
| Discourtesy: Word | Black Male, 50-54 | Unable to Determine |
| Offensive Language: Disability | Black Male, 50-54 | Unable to Determine |
| Discourtesy: Word | Black Male, 50-54 | Unable to Determine |
| Offensive Language: Other | Black Male, 50-54 | Unable to Determine |
| Discourtesy: Word | Black Male, 50-54 | Unable to Determine |
| Discourtesy: Word | Black Male, 50-54 | Unable to Determine |
| Offensive Language: Gender | Black Male, 50-54 | Unable to Determine |
| Discourtesy: Word | Black Male, 50-54 | Unable to Determine |
| Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera | Male, 50-54 | Substantiated (Command Discipline A) |
| NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP | ||
| Penalty: No penalty | ||
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
Further details on conclusions.
Lawsuits
Morales, Janette vs City of Ny, et al.Case # 25CV06407, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, August 8, 2025