Jamalco R. Baptiste

Badge #27114, Black Male
Former Police Officer at Transit Bureau District 1
Also served at 122nd Precinct
Service started January 2007, ended June 2021, Tax #944083

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2010-722
Closed: 5/14/2010

View Details

Complaints

6 Complaints
15 Allegations
0 Substantiated
2 Complainant Uncooperative
2 Exonerated
5 Unfounded
6 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #201205063, April 2012
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: White Female, 21
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #201103725, March 2011
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Female, 25
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #201101722, February 2011
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Male
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #201001594, January 2010
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: White Male, 18
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: White Male, 18
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: White Male, 18
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: White Male, 18
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #200900159, January 2009
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 53
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Offensive Language: Race
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 53
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Force: Nightstick as club (incl asp & baton)
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 53
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 53
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Force: Handcuffs too tight
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 53
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 53
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #200813725, September 2008
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property
Complainant: White Male, 38
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
Complainant: White Male, 38
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #201205063, April 2012
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word White Female, 21 Unfounded
additional details
Complaint #201103725, March 2011
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Female, 25 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #201101722, February 2011
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Male Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #201001594, January 2010
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) White Male, 18 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Frisk White Male, 18 Unsubstantiated
Force: Physical force White Male, 18 Unsubstantiated
Discourtesy: Word White Male, 18 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #200900159, January 2009
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 53 Unfounded
Offensive Language: Race Hispanic Male, 53 Unsubstantiated
Force: Nightstick as club (incl asp & baton) Hispanic Male, 53 Exonerated
Discourtesy: Word Hispanic Male, 53 Unsubstantiated
Force: Handcuffs too tight Hispanic Male, 53 Unfounded
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 53 Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #200813725, September 2008
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property White Male, 38 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop White Male, 38 Unfounded
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2010-722
Closed: 5/14/2010
Case Details:
  1. Guilty: After learning that a civilian employee was involved in a police incident at a location known to the Department, did fail to report the facts to his Commanding Officer, as required.
  2. Guilty: Failed to conduct all the necessary investigative steps to determine the validity or existence of the order of protection.
  3. Guilty: Failed to make authorized, relevant entries regarding tasks performed during his tour, in his Department issued memobook.
Penalty: Vacation days (10 days)