George F. Bodenmiller

George F. Bodenmiller

George F. Bodenmiller
Badge #26100, White Male
Police Officer at 103rd Precinct since December 2021, active
Service started July 2021, made $60,200 last year, Tax #972383

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2024-29834
Closed: 3/25/2024

View Details

Complaints

2 Complaints
10 Allegations
1 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
1 Unable to Determine
3 Unfounded
5 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202300847, September 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to show arrest warrant
Complainant: Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to show arrest warrant
Complainant: Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card
Complainant: Age 55-59
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Penalty: Formalized Training
additional details

Complaint #202204273, June 2022
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
Complainant: Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Force: Chokehold
Complainant: Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Other
Complainant: Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #202300847, September 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to show arrest warrant Male, 21-24 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to show arrest warrant Male, 21-24 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card Age 55-59 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Penalty: Formalized Training
additional details
Complaint #202204273, June 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Male, 25-29 Within NYPD Guidelines
Force: Physical force Male, 25-29 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Male, 25-29 Within NYPD Guidelines
Force: Chokehold Male, 25-29 Unfounded
Force: Physical force Male, 25-29 Within NYPD Guidelines
Force: Physical force Male, 25-29 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Other Male, 25-29 Unable to Determine
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2024-29834
Closed: 3/25/2024
Case Details:
  1. Violated patrol rules - failed to provide a business card
Penalty: Training
Recommendation: Training